Re: Dead bimbos
- From: "Sherry Davis" <NoSpam@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 21:59:46 GMT
"The psychotic John Griffin and his alter ego Gerry"
<thatpsychobilly@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Xns98236CF138D04thathillbillyyahooco@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Note: Anyone who wants to see the most idiotic thing ever posted
here without scrolling through this article can scroll down to
where you will see ******.
Lets save all that trouble and just post it here.
******Here follows the most idiotic statement ever posted in this
newsgroup:
My statement was in fact;
"6/50 × 5/49 × 4/48 × 3/47 × 2/46 × 1/45 = 720/11,441,304,000
or 1/15890700"
Did you really say something that fucking idiotic?! The
probability of a particular number being drawn is 1/15890700?!
NO ***?! BWAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHA! I don't doubt it; I just don't
remember anyone ever being so colossally stupid.
LOL, use your scroll bar and go back to the conversation.
You do know how to use the scroll bar, don't you?
(If not I will be glad to instruct you)
You have once again twisted a statement and taken it completely out of
context. My full statement was, and I quote:
"To calculate the outcome of a multiple objects being pulled you would
simply factor the above. Thus, the odds of pulling a pre-selected set of 6
objects from a pool of 50 objects would be;
6/50 × 5/49 × 4/48 × 3/47 × 2/46 × 1/45 = 720/11,441,304,000 or 1 chance in
15.89 million."
Not a SINGLE NUMBER retard, a PRE-SELECTED SET.
John, you really are as stupid as you pretend to be, aren't you?
That factual statement slapped you into three specific learning
opportunities and one more important general one.
John, you poor ignorant fool.
Point out one factual statement you have made.
Note: Do not include misquoted statements of someone else's statement,
twisted items taken out of context, made-up math, and out and out lies.
Second learning opportunity: Where do you find a definition of
"uhoh," "uh-oh" or "uh oh"? (Hint: Nowhere.) Since it's just an
interjection
You have a profusion of dictionaries and thesauruses scattered around your
computer. Try the American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language
Third learning opportunity: What, exactly, does the prefix
"super" mean in your bimbo lexicon, and why do you believe it
can't be used as a prefix?
Hey pinhead, I did not make the rules. Look it up.
Serious suggestion: Redirect all the time you spend in your
obsessive and futile search for solecisms in my posts. Use it to
do your Remedial English homework instead.
LOL, there are always many poor uses of English in your posts.
I just pointed out the first two to irritate you.
I didn't even mention that for someone who "prides" himself in his language
ability that you use an inordinate amount of profanity and slang.
Always a sign of poor grammatical skills.
The facts:(Corrected for accuracy by restoring the admonition.)
John: "The only way to improve your chance of winning a
lottery jackpot is to buy another ticket.
Do NOT, repeat DO NOT use the same combination for the
second ticket.
LOL, that little correction appeared after I had pointed out how you had
misquoted someone else and claimed the statement as a "John Original".
Lets just take a little trip in the "way-back" machine.
Topic: Handy Reminders
Author: John Griffin thathillbilly@xxxxxxxxxxx
Posted: Monday, July 17, 2006 11:45 AM
John: "The only way to improve your chance of winning a lottery jackpot is
to buy another ticket."
Facts John, lets deal in the facts.
You: "You have a little ***."
LOL, You have repeated this lie so many times you actually
believe its true. Please find where I answered any one of your
questions with "You have a little ***".
Since we both, among all others, know that was your very first
tantrum, and I never bother looking at archives, you aren't going
to be able to distance yourself from that. You can look it up,
or if your news server's retention time for this group is long
enough, you can still view it in it's hilarious original.
John, my pointy-headed little friend, that's a really pathetic cop-out.
It's a simple matter of a text search.
You do know how to do a text search, don't you?
(If not I will be glad to instruct you)
Your persistent lying has brought it to that age-old point of "Put up or
Shut up" : )
If you cannot then take a reality break and stop lying about
it
Look it up if you truly need to refresh your memory.
I did and you, dear sweet retard, are a liar. :)
Your lottery facts consists of the same old two-sentence
misquote of someone else's statements amongst a spew of
psychotic ranting that include "idiot", "stupid", "crank
sucker", "chain-wanker ", "sh*tforbrains", "Pu**y", "***",
etc, etc,
I thought you'd be able to at least read the herd of handy
reminders, airhead. Silly me...and I really thought you could
count beyond two...sillier me. I knew you couldn't understand
them, but I thought having them serially number from 1 through 13
or whatever would give you the clue that there were more than
two. Damn, underestimating your stupidity is so easy that it's
nearly impossible to avoid it.
LOL every assertion you make is based on and a rewording of that same old
two-part fantasy theory you keep trying to cram down people's gullet.
2. I will stop making post showing how idiotic you are.
You: "The authors of mathematics texts are wrong. You're an
idiot (for having learned what they teach)."
Once again you demonstrate you unchecked propensity of lying
and twisting of statements to excavate yourself from the
embarrassments of your own idiotic statements.
Your laughable attempts to argue against the fair coin and fair
die experiments the authors talk about amount to saying they're
wrong, airhead.
Once again, your puny little brain attempts to twist the facts to suit you
needs.
I never agued against the "fair coin".
I simply pointed out, a simplistically as I could (for the benefit of your
weak comprehension skills) that it was a theoretical model.
LOL, look who is talking. The same troll that ends nearly
every post to me with the same old tired set of lies.
Lies? At this point, I'll challenge you to identify one such and
you'll reply "LOL, look who is talking. The same troll that ends
nearly every post to me with the same old tired set of lies."
Already did, about a dozen times.
Ah, there are none so blind as him who will not see.
< Spewing of Psychotic Babbling and Lies Snipped>
PS.
I am young and healthy.
You are old and sickly.
Who's going to get the last post?
(and that is how you tell who won the debate, isn't it John)
BWAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHA! HA! HA! HA! HA!
PPS
http://www.accs.net/users/kriel/chapter%20three/roadrunner.jpg
BLEEP-BLEEP
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Dead bimbos
- From: John Griffin
- Re: Dead bimbos
- References:
- Dead bimbos
- From: John Griffin
- Re: Dead bimbos
- From: Sherry Davis
- Re: Dead bimbos
- From: John Griffin
- Re: Dead bimbos
- From: Sherry Davis
- Re: Dead bimbos
- From: John Griffin
- Re: Dead bimbos
- From: Sherry Davis
- Re: Dead bimbos
- From: John Griffin
- Dead bimbos
- Prev by Date: Re: Introducing LottoJet
- Next by Date: Re: Dead bimbos
- Previous by thread: Re: Dead bimbos
- Next by thread: Re: Dead bimbos
- Index(es):