Re: Dead bimbos

"The psychotic and newly alcoholically reinforced John Griffin and his alter
ego Gerry"
<thatpsychobilly@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Xns98236CF138D04thathillbillyyahooco@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

This post is a vast improvement over the whinny "poor me" post you made
earlier.
Glad to see the liquor stores are open and you are back to normal.

"Uneducable Sherry Davis and her twerp Jim" <NoSpam@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

Come on John you can do better this.
Make me cry bullyboy, make the little girl cry you pathetic
fat, slovenly excuse for a man.

<snicker> Uhoh...the dumb mercurial fat broad is going
superpetulant on us...bwaaaaaaaaaahahahahaha!

Uhoh = Uh oh
superpetulant = super petulant (super cranky?)

There are dozens scattered about in this (and all) of your other post but to
point out each and everyone would be too time consuming and just plain
picky.


Better yet, conjure up your imaginary buddy Gerry. He at least
can make an attempt at an insult.

Tell you what, how about a truce with the following terms.
1. You stop making idiotic post full of psychotic BS.

Me: "The only way to improve your chance of winning a lottery
jackpot is to buy another ticket."

The facts:
John: "The only way to improve your chance of winning a lottery jackpot is
to buy another ticket."
Me: "I purchase 2 tickets. One with the numbers 1,2,3,4,5,6 and the second
ticket with the numbers 1,2,3,4,5,6. How has this improved my odds?"
I then pointed out the correct statement (from which you misquoted and tried
to claim credit for) is:
"The only way to improve your odds for winning a lottery jackpot is to buy
another ticket and make sure it doesn't have the same numbers you already
selected on the previous ticket"
John: "You should have known what I meant"


You: "You have a little ***."

LOL, You have repeated this lie so many times you actually believe its true.
Please find where I answered any one of your questions with "You have a
little ***".
If you cannot then take a reality break and stop lying about it


Since your reflexes have taken you exactly in the same direction
every time I've posted a fact about lottery, your mindless remark
makes a hilariously interesting contrast.

Your lottery facts consists of the same old two-sentence misquote of someone
else's statements amongst a spew of psychotic ranting that include "idiot",
"stupid", "crank
sucker", "chain-wanker ", "sh*tforbrains", "Pu**y", "***", etc, etc,


However, that contrast pales beside your "I'm an unemployed
mental health councilor."
<snicker>

Again, you have twisted a statement and repeated the lie so many times you
actually believe its true.
Its getting a bit stale so please find where I made the statement "I'm an
unemployed mental health councilor".
If you cannot then take another reality break and cease lying about it


2. I will stop making post showing how idiotic you are.

You: "The authors of mathematics texts are wrong. You're an idiot
(for having learned what they teach)."

Once again you demonstrate you unchecked propensity of lying and twisting of
statements to excavate yourself from the embarrassments of your own idiotic
statements.
I am the one who quotes, verbatim, the math formula and theorems.
You are the one that calls the great mathematical minds "dumbasses" and
makes up incomprehensible BS that has been twisted to meet your purpose


Hell off a contrast. Fuckin' hilarious.

3. You drink a gallon of bleach.
4. I will send flowers.

Speaking of psychotic, crazy bimbo, are you counting the times
you've wished someone dead? That sort of thing seems to be one
of the dominant mental issues among those having high positive
correlation with unhealthy body mass index. Have you actually
fallen on someone and crushed him to death, do you often have to
suppress the compulsion to do so, or are you just all bellow and
snivel?

Me? Wishing someone (you) dead?
My, whatever gave you that idea?
BWAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHA! HA! HA! HA! HA!


Until then, any post by you will be followed by a post by me,
GET USED TO IT.

rotmfflmmfao! You think I don't want to see you mess yourself by
repeating your "The authors of mathematics texts are wrong"?! I
enjoy being amused, and that's fuckin' hilarious, bimbo. That
one gets even funnier...your knee-jerk response to a challenge to
back it up is to repeat verbatim the same amazingly stupid
remark. Do you think I don't want to see you spewing the idiotic
nonsense that there's some way other buying more tickets to
improve your chance of winning a lottery jackpot?! Why the ***
do you think I challenge you to back up your airheaded gobble,
fool? If you had even minimal learning capacity, you would have
learned that I'm the only one who wants to see your
scatterbrained posts. Thanks for the admonition...
bwaaaaaaaaahahaha!

This is just a combined spew of your idiotic statements made elsewhere in
the post so they have already been addressed.
John, repetition of lies does not make them truths.


By the way, good choice of words..."a post from me" -- not an
answer, just a post. I love it. You would never allow an
attempt to address the topic to worm its way into your
conditioned response, even if the impulse to do so happened to
strike before you finish regurgitating whatever part of your
laughably stupid cant you choose to spew.

Humm, I believe you are the one who constantly changes the subject matter
whenever you paint yourself in a corner.


PS.
I am young and healthy.
John is old and sickly.
Who's going to get the last post?
BWAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHA! HA! HA! HA! HA!

Are you counting the number of times you're forced to repeat
every childish thought that pops into your little mind?

LOL, look who is talking. The same troll that ends nearly every post to me
with the same old tired set of lies.


You zombies will be the last to notice that your need to snip
everything before reposting your reflexive twaddle arises
autonomously from the unassailable fact that you have no idea how
to directly address the facts that set off those airheaded little
fits. Try to notice it today. You're getting farther behind
every minute.

I will continue to snip your spew of psycho babbling whenever I choose.
Why not? It's always the same garbage that you have posted a hundred times
before.


Let's see if we can prompt you to have your very first learning
experience...

Your assignment:

1) Tell me exactly why the mathematics textbook authors are wrong
in those hundreds of examples of fair die and fair coin
experiments. As a related matter, tell me why "assume a fair
coin (or die)" is an invalid insturction or totally confounding
to you.

LOL John. Do you think twisting the facts around are going to make people
forget I am the one that quoted Bayes's (and others) theorems and pointed to
the references on its workings.
To refresh you memory reread the thread "A Little Q & A For John/Gerry
(names interchangeable)"


2) Tell me exactly how to improve your chance of winning a
lottery jackpot other than buying another ticket. Note: Since the
event ("reduced set") you've ballyhooed earlier is actually a
consequence of the event you portray as dependent on it, avoid
any reference to conditional probability so as to minimize your
self-humiliation. Let's have a serious analysis here, okay?

No one has ever disputed that buying additional tickets (making sure, of
course, they do not have the same numbers you already selected on the
previous tickets) is the only "absolute" way of improving your odds.

However, the facts supplied in multiple places show that lines produced by
humans, using various different methodologies, out produce randomly selected
number lines.
Need hard data on this? See the attachment to the thread "Draw Stats - Quick
Picks Vs. Choose Your Own"
Of course you have already looked at it but you choose to ignore it because
it does not conform to your fantasy lottery theory.

As to the "Tell me exactly how to improve your chance of winning" part. That
's what everyone would like to discuss if you would take your psychotic
disturbances elsewhere.


3) Background: According to the most fundamental theory of
probability, the likelihood of an outcome of a random event such
as tossing a fair coin (see an elementary probability text if you
don't readily comprehend that term) or drawing a ball out of a
bin is S/N, where S is the number of ways the event can happen
and N is the number of possible outcomes. According to you,
there's another definition in applications. Question: What,
exactly, is that other definition? (Subsidiary question: Do you
intend to publish your unique "knowledge" of this topic?)

See thread "Fun-filled Facts That Are Not Made Up"


4) You say that the probability that a particular number will
come up in a 6/50 lottery is 1/50+1/49+1/48+1/47+1/46+1/45. Tell
me exactly how you came up with that. (Is it just one of those
things that you see as mystically different in application versus
theory?)

LOL John. Please find where I made this statement.
If you cannot then stop lying about it as lying about it now will not change
the facts. Anyone can go back and read who said what.

My statement was in fact;
"6/50 × 5/49 × 4/48 × 3/47 × 2/46 × 1/45 = 720/11,441,304,000 or 1/15890700"


Just the facts as you see them--but of course if you insist on
tacitly confessing that you have no ideas on any of that stuff,
just snip it and shriek that it's psychotic babble; and if you
prefer to overtly confes, just say so.

I'm glad we have this opportunity to discuss lottery, aren't you?

I would welcome the opportunity to discuss the lottery but I fear that
cannot be done until you visit the Kevorkian clinic.




PS.
I am young and healthy.
You are old and sickly.
Who's going to get the last post?
BWAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHA! HA! HA! HA! HA!

PPS
http://www.accs.net/users/kriel/chapter%20three/roadrunner.jpg
BLEEP-BLEEP


.