Re: Dead bimbos

"Uneducable Sherry Davis and her twerp Jim" <NoSpam@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

Come on John you can do better this.
Make me cry bully boy, make the little girl cry you pathetic
fat, slovenly excuse for a man.

<snicker> Uhoh...the dumb mercurial fat broad is going
superpetulant on us...bwaaaaaaaaaahahahahaha!

Better yet, conjure up your imaginary buddy Gerry. He at least
can make an attempt at an insult.

Tell you what, how about a truce with the following terms.
1. You stop making idiotic post full of psychotic BS.

Me: "The only way to improve your chance of winning a lottery
jackpot is to buy another ticket."
You: "You have a little ***."

Since your reflexes have taken you exactly in the same direction
every time I've posted a fact about lottery, your mindless remark
makes a hilariously interesting contrast. However, that contrast
pales beside your "I'm an unemployed mental health councilor."
<snicker>

2. I will stop making post showing how idiotic you are.

You: "The authors of mathematics texts are wrong. You're an idiot
(for having learned what they teach)."

Hell off a contrast. Fuckin' hilarious.

3. You drink a gallon of bleach.
4. I will send flowers.

Speaking of psychotic, crazy bimbo, are you counting the times
you've wished someone dead? That sort of thing seems to be one
of the dominant mental issues among those having high positive
correlation with unhealthy body mass index. Have you actually
fallen on someone and crushed him to death, do you often have to
suppress the compulsion to do so, or are you just all bellow and
snivel?

Until then, any post by you will be followed by a post by me,
GET USED TO IT.

rotmfflmmfao! You think I don't want to see you mess yourself by
repeating your "The authors of mathematics texts are wrong"?! I
enjoy being amused, and that's fuckin' hilarious, bimbo. That
one gets even funnier...your knee-jerk response to a challenge to
back it up is to repeat verbatim the same amazingly stupid
remark. Do you think I don't want to see you spewing the idiotic
nonsense that there's some way other buying more tickets to
improve your chance of winning a lottery jackpot?! Why the ***
do you think I challenge you to back up your airheaded gobble,
fool? If you had even minimal learning capacity, you would have
learned that I'm the only one who wants to see your
scatterbrained posts. Thanks for the admonition...
bwaaaaaaaaahahaha!

By the way, good choice of words..."a post from me" -- not an
answer, just a post. I love it. You would never allow an
attempt to address the topic to worm its way into your
conditioned response, even if the impulse to do so happened to
strike before you finish regurgitating whatever part of your
laughably stupid cant you choose to spew.

PS.
I am young and healthy.
John is old and sickly.
Who's going to get the last post?
BWAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHA! HA! HA! HA! HA!

Are you counting the number of times you're forced to repeat
every childish thought that pops into your little mind?

You zombies will be the last to notice that your need to snip
everything before reposting your reflexive twaddle arises
autonomously from the unassailable fact that you have no idea how
to directly address the facts that set off those airheaded little
fits. Try to notice it today. You're getting farther behind
every minute.

Let's see if we can prompt you to have your very first learning
experience...

Your assignment:

1) Tell me exactly why the mathematics textbook authors are wrong
in those hundreds of examples of fair die and fair coin
experiments. As a related matter, tell me why "assume a fair
coin (or die)" is an invalid insturction or totally confounding
to you.

2) Tell me exactly how to improve your chance of winning a
lottery jackpot other than buying another ticket. Note: Since the
event ("reduced set") you've ballyhooed earlier is actually a
consequence of the event you portray as dependent on it, avoid
any reference to conditional probability so as to minimize your
self-humiliation. Let's have a serious analysis here, okay?

3) Background: According to the most fundamental theory of
probability, the likelihood of an outcome of a random event such
as tossing a fair coin (see an elementary probability text if you
don't readily comprehend that term) or drawing a ball out of a
bin is S/N, where S is the number of ways the event can happen
and N is the number of possible outcomes. According to you,
there's another definition in applications. Question: What,
exactly, is that other definition? (Subsidiary question: Do you
intend to publish your unique "knowledge" of this topic?)

4) You say that the probability that a particular number will
come up in a 6/50 lottery is 1/50+1/49+1/48+1/47+1/46+1/45. Tell
me exactly how you came up with that. (Is it just one of those
things that you see as mystically different in application versus
theory?)

Just the facts as you see them--but of course if you insist on
tacitly confessing that you have no ideas on any of that stuff,
just snip it and shriek that it's psychotic babble; and if you
prefer to overtly confes, just say so.

I'm glad we have this opportunity to discuss lottery, aren't you?


.