Re: Dead bimbos

"Psychotic John Griffin and his alter ego" <thatpsychobilly@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote in message news:Xns98236CF138D04thathillbillyyahooco@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx


The bimbos posted:

--One repeat of their scatterbrained attempt to ingratiate
themselves with a spammer. They both want to suck his crank.



FACT 4: When John is totally stumped as to what to say he will simply make
up some incomprehensible BS to cover his ignorance.
LOL, any post by you will be followed by a post by me, GET USED TO IT.

This little spat also shows your mental regression is more pronounced in
that you are again obsessing with fellatio and men's penises. Most likely
caused by sexual frustration brought on by an unfixable leak in your blowup
sex partner.



--Two repeats of some of their standard long-since dismissed
gobble. (One of the funniest parts, in essence: "Applied
mathematics and theoretical mathematics are two separate and
distinct bodies of knowledge." Fuckin' hilarious.)



FACT 2: John Griffin cannot differentiate between theoretical and practical
math nor does he properly understand either.
Had you completed high school you would know that there are theories that
can be proved mathematically but cannot be proven out in an applied test. To
oversimplify so that your feeble brain might understand.

According to Einstein's theory of special relativity nothing can exceed the
speed of light. He proved this to be true mathematically but until they beef
up the Corvette a bit more, it remains theory.




--One completely idiotic "question," showing that the awesomely
stupid bimbos cling to the "Griffin is Gerry/Gerry is Griffin"
idiocy even after Abraxas manipulated them into showing that they
can't sustain such stupid nonsense even in their stunted minds.



Gerry is Griffin

Griffin is Nothing

Therefore

Gerry = Nothing

Also, it has been my observation that Abraxas does not attempt to manipulate
anyone.

This little spat only shows your advanced degree of paranoia in that you
believe that everyone is trying to manipulate everyone else.




--No attempts to refute any of the facts that slap them into
those hilarious tantrums.



FACT 9: When someone answers one of John's foolish assertions and shows him
for the idiot he is, he simply ignores it and continues to ask the same
question over and over and over and over again.
John, what question did I fail to answer and REFUTE?
Hint here; If you throw out the same old stuff I have answered before I will
simply tell you to see the previous thread.


--Nothing that they haven't posted a dozen times or more, except
the attempt to get into the spammer's shorts, which they've done
only twice.

SEE FACT 9.
Yep, you keep making the same idiotic remarks and I keep proving you wrong.
It just got to be silly.

I ask again:

John, what question did I fail to answer and REFUTE?
Hint here; If you throw out the same old stuff I have answered before I will
simply tell you to see the previous thread.


--Reaffirmation of the fact that the two-value random variable (a
"fair coin" or "unbiased coin" in the parlance of the authors of
statistics texts) is too complex for the bimbos, a reminder that
the 49-value situation, for example, is immensely far over their
heads or tails.



FACT 6: John believes if he repeats a lie over and over again it will become
true.
I did a 4-page reply to you about your "fair coin" and your misguided belief
as to how it applied to the lottery.

I also pointed you to several references that made your beliefs look as
foolish as you are.



R.I.P, bimbos.



I am young and healthy.
You are old and sick.
Who's going to get the last post?
BWAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHA! HA! HA! HA! HA!

PS
http://www.accs.net/users/kriel/chapter%20three/roadrunner.jpg
BLEEP-BLEEP

----------
A brief history of psychotic babbling of John
Griffin(psychobilly@xxxxxxxxxxx)



John: "Buying any two tickets doubles your chance of winning. (See Below)"
Normal People: "BWAAAAAHAHAHAHAHA!"
Sherry: "If the first one has 1,2,3,4,5,6 and the second one has
1,2,3,4,5,6, how does that double your chances? John learn to properly cut
and paste other peoples expressions, the correct expression is 'The only way
to improve your odds for winning a lottery jackpot is to buy another ticket
and make sure it doesn't have the same numbers you already selected on the
previous ticket'."
John: "Well, you should have known what I meant."



John: "The probability of a particular number being drawn in a 50-ball
lottery is 1/50+1/49+1/48+1/47+1/46+1/45. (I can not believe I said that so
I'll blame it on someone else)"
Normal People: "BWAAAAAHAHAHAHAHA!"
Sherry: "6/50 × 5/49 × 4/48 × 3/47 × 2/46 × 1/45 = 720/11,441,304,000 or
1/15890700"



John: "The only way to increase your chance of winning a lottery jackpot is
to buy another ticket (there I went and said it again)"
Normal People: "BWAAAAAHAHAHAHAHA!"
Sherry: "Is your job devoted to spreading ignorance?"



John: "Bayes's theorem deals with cause and effect."
Normal people: "BWAAAAAHAHAHAHAHA!"
Sherry: "Bayes's theorem is the defining mathematical formula for
calculating conditional probabilities."
John: "Damn It, Don't confuse me with FACTS!!!!"



Saving the best for last...
Sherry: "John, Call the Kevorkian clinic and see if you can move up your
appointment."




.