Re: (UK) Second Most Popular Combo is....

"John Griffin" <thathillbilly@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Xns97B4671D51B88thathillbillyyahooco@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Wiseguy" <donteventhinkaboutit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

"John Griffin" <thathillbilly@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Xns97B3AE4EB76Bthathillbillyyahooco@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Wiseguy" <donteventhinkaboutit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

"Nigel" <useweb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:44528125$0$23189$ed2e19e4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Wiseguy wrote:

"Nigel" <useweb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:445229eb$0$23171$ed2e19e4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
.

4,8,15,16,23,42

Some people are completely Lost when it comes to choosing
decent combos.

Evil Nigel



Elaborate?

Trashy US mystery drama about a group of impossibly
immaculate people stranded on an island after a plane crash
featuring several recurring themes such as invisible
monsters, polar bears and the combo 4,8,15,16,23,42.

nuff said?

Evil Nigel


That does it for me. I wonder if there's any way to
determine what the single most played combo has been for any
specific lottery game. The one mentioned here hasn't fared
very well over the entire history of the UK 649...22
match3's and 1 match4...out of 1079 draws. For the Canadian
649...29 match3's out of 2323 draws.

I recall reading somewhere recently that a Canadian jackpot
winner had continuously played some combo since the
inception of the game...some 24 years. That's what I call
patience.

There should be millions who do that. There's no reason to
change. I hope the guy continues playing that combination.
It would be cool to hear that he won twice, and there's still
no reason for him to change.

You don't know whether that combination has "fared well"
unless you know how many times it has been played. Hosers
are a superstitious lot and they're afraid of anything that
doesn't have a seven or a nine in it. Maybe. Something like
that. Who cares?


Right on fucking schedule. "Who cares?" is precisely
right...nobody but you...the King of worthlessness.

Answer the fucking question if you can. Dispute what I said
<snicker> if you <snicker> <ha ha ha yuk yuk> can <ROTFL>.


I don't see any question in your useless remarks that requires an
answer...other than your trademark "Who cares?"...which I did answer.

Seriously, I know you're embarrassed by having made those dumb
remarks and needing to be instructed as to another of the flaws
in your thinking, but try to get a fuckin' grip, okay? There will
always be flaws in your thinking. The algorithms encoded in your
family DNA are failed prototypes that were discarded 500
generations ago in the main stream of human evolution.


What a surprise! Yet another in an endless series of unjustified personal
attacks that pollutes yet another thread.


.

Quantcast