Re: FAQ * r.g.l.faq * 01/17/2006
- From: John Griffin <thathillbilly@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 22 Jan 2006 18:48:25 GMT
"IXL Software" <radio.funnyfarm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> "John Griffin" <thathillbilly@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:Xns9753C928B239thathillbillyyahooco@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> "IXL Software" <radio.funnyfarm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> "John Griffin" <thathillbilly@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>> news:Xns975262890CC05thathillbillyyahooco@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> "IXL Software" <radio.funnyfarm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> "Nik Barker" <nicholasbarker01@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
>>>>> message
>>>>> news:1137809023.662714.24670@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> .
>>>>>>
>>>>>> John Griffin wrote:
>>>>>>> So far, you've managed to post the dumbest thing
>>>>>>> ever seen here two days in a row. That was even dumber
>>>>>>> than "the impossible combination 1,2,3,4,5,6."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Phew! That's me down to third place.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe the Griffin "wunderkind" would like to reveal who
>>>>> posted "the impossible combination 1,2,3,4,5,6." I have a
>>>>> hunch that he thinks it was me. I once posted an article
>>>>> that addressed the self-same sequence as the "infamous
>>>>> combination". Take careful note of the difference in
>>>>> meaning between the words "impossible" and "infamous".
>>>>>
>>>>> Just one more indication that the miserable prick can't
>>>>> keep his facts straight and arrogantly assumes that
>>>>> everyone else in the world suffers from the same
>>>>> intellectual limitations that he must endure on a daily
>>>>> basis.
>>>>>
>>>>> The *** may not take immediate flight, but he must
>>>>> surely be packing his bags.
>>>>
>>>> Actually, you did say that combination was impossible. It
>>>> doesn't matter what else you said. Also, I'll be here to
>>>> laugh at whatever dumb *** you post next.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I would be very interested to see when and where I ever
>>> described that combination as "impossible"...
>>
>> rec.gambling.lottery
>>
>
> Very funny. That's kinda like saying "Earth" when someone asks
> where you're from.
Lots of people suspect that you'd be lying if you said that--they
say you're from McCoy Fantasyland.
>>>other than in
>>> your faulty memory that is.
>>
>>
>> If I had said that, I'd say I was joking instead of trying to
>> deny it. Say you were joking. The big difference is that I
>> would have been, but still, your best bet is to pretend you
>> were. If you deny saying it, people will just say "Yeah,
>> right."
>>
>
> Typical Griffin tactics...answer with a weasely non-answer and
> then try to make the other person look like a fool for even
> asking a straightforward question.
If you think you need help looking like a fool, you're a fool.
> The Bush White House desperately needs you. RGL doesn't.
I thought Bush only wanted church-goin' god-fearin'
prayermongers!
Furthermore, as long as you and your kind think the probability
that last night's 6/49 numbers will be drawn two consecutive
times is (1/13983816)^2, and other such silly nonsense, RGL needs
at least one person who will politely and fucking genteelly tell
you you're out of your fucking mind. I'm sharing that duty with
anyone else who wants it.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: FAQ * r.g.l.faq * 01/17/2006
- From: IXL Software
- Re: FAQ * r.g.l.faq * 01/17/2006
- From: Jack Ricci
- Re: FAQ * r.g.l.faq * 01/17/2006
- References:
- FAQ * r.g.l.faq * 01/17/2006
- From: Robert Perkis
- Re: FAQ * r.g.l.faq * 01/17/2006
- From: True Brit
- Re: FAQ * r.g.l.faq * 01/17/2006
- From: John Griffin
- Re: FAQ * r.g.l.faq * 01/17/2006
- From: erce
- Re: FAQ * r.g.l.faq * 01/17/2006
- From: John Griffin
- Re: FAQ * r.g.l.faq * 01/17/2006
- From: erce
- Re: FAQ * r.g.l.faq * 01/17/2006
- From: John Griffin
- Re: FAQ * r.g.l.faq * 01/17/2006
- From: Nik Barker
- Re: FAQ * r.g.l.faq * 01/17/2006
- From: IXL Software
- Re: FAQ * r.g.l.faq * 01/17/2006
- From: John Griffin
- Re: FAQ * r.g.l.faq * 01/17/2006
- From: IXL Software
- Re: FAQ * r.g.l.faq * 01/17/2006
- From: John Griffin
- Re: FAQ * r.g.l.faq * 01/17/2006
- From: IXL Software
- FAQ * r.g.l.faq * 01/17/2006
- Prev by Date: Re: FAQ * r.g.l.faq * 01/17/2006
- Next by Date: Re: The Top Ten Unpredictable Lottery Things
- Previous by thread: Re: FAQ * r.g.l.faq * 01/17/2006
- Next by thread: Re: FAQ * r.g.l.faq * 01/17/2006
- Index(es):
Loading