Re: Which Side Are You On, Boys?

Alan....one of my statements/positons that I stated was "There is NO
inumdatiuon in the perfect 1 in 6 , is there ? In this case can you admit
that everything rebalanced and evened out the way it was predicted to
happen ?" Among your reponse was this comment, " However, the longer you
roll the more unlikely the exact ratio becomes." I don't agree with what
you said here.

The law if averages says that in many dice rolls, the fraction of 7's will
be approximately .16667.
The reason the word approximately is used is because of chance variation,
an inherent part of randomness. The other reason the word approximately is
used is because the law of averages is a limit theorem; It states
precisely what will happen in an infinate number of observations,
something we will never see. The long run means a large but finite number
of observations.

Chance variation i.e. *** happens, coupled with infinity (which the law
of averages requires) is why we say 'approximately'.

How can you say, based on the above that " the longer you roll the more
unlikely the ratio becomes." In my opinion, it can just as easily go the
other way. AND it can be dead on the 1 to 6
exactly.

Inundation does nothing for you to arrive at 1 in 6. Because the 1 in 6
ratio is correct, sometimes it needs time to approach/arrive at that
ratio,
and it does. The 1 in 6 is met because within your unindation my
compensation is at work. I do the heavy lifting, you just give me the time
to do it.

777

.