Re: Nonsense

Ah, by claiming that you are an"original thinker" you hope to thereby
elude Mason's challenge that you post "one authoritative reference
where "stochastic volatility" or "Poisson process" is applied to games
of chance involving random and independent trials."

Were your "original" thoughts and conclusions indeed valid, one must
wonder why you are "one of the few out there in crapsdom that is
"preaching" this view of the game?"

Surely such a sharp guy as you claim to be would have discussed this
ground-breaking math on some of the math boards, with much constructive
comment and give and take in an objective manner by others; how about a
cite ... or two?

Otherwise, please STFU.

roll dem bones

.