Re: Question for JB re: 'Shooter Due Theory'
- From: "basicstrategy777" <ninonistri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 17:15:12 -0500
midnite
I think you are OK.
But Listen to what I'm going to tell you.
YOUR MATH IS FUCKING CORRECT !!
MY MATH DOES NOT SUPPORT NUMBER DUE THEORY !!
How many friggin' times do you people need to hear me say this and how
many different ways do you want me to say it.
You said: "Only after refusing even to consider that an idea was mistaken
or an assumption doggy(by gathering supporting evidence and/or summaily
dismissing contradictory evidence) were derogatory labels attached to the
one who advanced it."
You are saying if I want to believe in 'number due theory' it is OK to
attach derogatory labels to me. Is that what you are saying ? If it is,
you have gone down a couple notches in my book pal.
My feeling is if I don't attack you and I am not hurting you, I deserve no
derogatory labels; no one does..... EVEN, if we don't agree and you don't
like my position and you know it is wrong.
Unfortunately, you people have internet road rage
on this board and apparently, I have put a giant bug up your ass. Relax.
Dic Doc
These guys can give you formulas up the ying-yang
but you see what happens at the table.
Unlike 'pencil head' I don't care what you believe or how you play. I am
not fighting fore your mind.
You have to survive and advance to be in this game and you have to do
everything in your power to make that happen. There is no strategy that
will make you a winner but our experience, knowledge and discipline will
carry us a long way.
By the way, be careful........ if it appears you are supportive of me
and/or take my side, you will be dumped on. These guys want you to think
down their track like a bowling ball tracks down a gutter.... or you will
be in deep do-do.
"Mathematics is not a careful march down a well cleared highway, but a
journey into a strange wilderness, where the explorers often get lost.
Rigour should be a signal to the historian that the maps have been made,
and the real explorers have gone elsewhere." W.S. Anglin
777
I can't wait to see how 'pencil head' attempts to discredit Krigman.
Knowing their types, I'm sure no apologies will be forthcoming from 'the
innumerate one', 'pencil head' or V if Krigmans figures are correct and
they are WRONG (again).
They will try to weasel out of it somehow.
Class.........they can't put it in you and they can't take it out.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Question for JB re: 'Shooter Due Theory'
- From: The Midnight Skulker
- Re: Question for JB re: 'Shooter Due Theory'
- From: Mason
- Re: Question for JB re: 'Shooter Due Theory'
- From: Mark Rafn
- Re: Question for JB re: 'Shooter Due Theory'
- References:
- Question for JB re: 'Shooter Due Theory'
- From: basicstrategy777
- Re: Question for JB re: 'Shooter Due Theory'
- From: John Kerr
- Re: Question for JB re: 'Shooter Due Theory'
- From: basicstrategy777
- Re: Question for JB re: 'Shooter Due Theory'
- From: Mason
- Re: Question for JB re: 'Shooter Due Theory'
- From: basicstrategy777
- Re: Question for JB re: 'Shooter Due Theory'
- From: The Midnight Skulker
- Question for JB re: 'Shooter Due Theory'
- Prev by Date: An example of BS777's "math"
- Next by Date: Anybody use this approach?
- Previous by thread: Re: Question for JB re: 'Shooter Due Theory'
- Next by thread: Re: Question for JB re: 'Shooter Due Theory'
- Index(es):