Re: No result is likely - Part II
- From: "LastCardSwings" <plnocowboy@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 16:30:10 -0800
On Nov 29 2005 3:08 PM, alan wrote:
> Unfortunately for players, we don't play as an aggregate-- we play as
> individuals. The casino plays against all players as an aggregate, we
> play against the casino individually-- so we don't share with other
> players or share the "math" that the casino plays by.
>
> Shank, why don't you reverse your thinking-- take it from the
> standpoint of the "player" and not from the standpoint of the "casino."
> Consider the disadvantage that each player has individually, and
> without the law of large numbers which does not apply to individuals?
Isn't the casino playing against us "individually" and NOT as an
"aggregate"?? You may win and I may lose but I don't hand my money to
you...I hand it to the casino...At the end of a toss, the casino doesn't
see who wins and who loses then make ONE payoff..they're done
individually. I believe the Shankster's post and numbers are for the
casino versus player individualy, whether the table has 21 people around
it or one.
-------
: the next generation of web-newsreaders : http://www.recgroups.com
.
- References:
- No result is likely - Part II
- From: Alan Shank
- Re: No result is likely - Part II
- From: alan
- No result is likely - Part II
- Prev by Date: Re: No result is likely - Part II
- Next by Date: Re: What do football pass plays and the pass line have in common?
- Previous by thread: Re: No result is likely - Part II
- Next by thread: Re: No result is likely - Part II
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
