Re: Craps were Borned
- From: "Sancho Panza" <otterpower@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 12:44:21 -0500
"Sancho Panza" <otterpower@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:dldtrh01v9m@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "Alan Shank" <goatcabin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:dn6kn1pjnta3a00i06ir5sssmg95lraql6@xxxxxxxxxx
> > On Tue, 15 Nov 2005 08:53:37 -0600, Jeff <ramin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >alan's question has been answered many, many times over the
> > >last year (or longer).
> > >
> > >He is either a troll or completely incapable of understanding
> > >the most basic concepts.
>
> Is that like doey-don't?
Snipping inadvertently omitted Alan Shank's line that provoked my comment:
> >He is either a troll or completely incapable of understanding
> >the most basic concepts.
>
> How about both?
Now comes, "Is that like doey-don't?"
Sorry for what may have been a confusing post.
.
- References:
- Craps were Borned
- From: Mason
- Re: Craps were Borned
- From: alan
- Re: Craps were Borned
- From: Mason
- Re: Craps were Borned
- From: ACDOC
- Re: Craps were Borned
- From: Alan Shank
- Re: Craps were Borned
- From: Sancho Panza
- Craps were Borned
- Prev by Date: Re: A prince among men
- Next by Date: "Wherever you go, there you are."
- Previous by thread: Re: Craps were Borned
- Next by thread: Re: Craps were Borned
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading