Re: Tea Wiki?

Every time you talk about a Rosetta timeline you keep adding more
contraditions. You've mentioned three so far public domain, awol, and
serendipity. Now your making up another excuse I'll call anachronism.
The first time we had a run in is when you wanted us to critique your
website. I told you this is the Usenet and not the WWW. (You still
haven't explained why you don't think that matters besides simply
postings URLs to drum up traffic for your website. If you need to find
something on the Internet you use Google. You don't need to litter
Usenet with links. Those days are long gone). I could go back and
find you responding to my posts directly or indirectly prior to you
requesting feedback on your site. I haven't checked that perse but I
remember I could almost see the expression on your face when I told you
to take your commercial website and get lost. It was like your mom
sitting you in the corner. It wasn't a stranger asking you to go for a
ride. Only then you started to hide behind Plonking and Killfiles
which you selectively choose to invoke. (For the rest of you who claim
I'm in your killfile let's see you back it up by not continously saying
I'm in your killfile). I hope people are paying attention to your
argument about commercial sites being allowed. Why don't you be honest
with us and make that argument about your running infomercial. If you
want to publish information using video rerouting to defeat copyright
protect you'll need my permission. But that hasn't stopped you before.
I preempted any EtTu charges by declaring Ebay a flea market in a
previous post. I'm sure I can find more websites that sell puerh with
Google than you list. You're probably using Google to come up with a
partial list without giving credit. Previously you mentioned they
had some stamp of approval and now you're making it sound like
potpourri. You still avoid the messy questions I've raised about
vendors who overcharge and misrepresent puerh. I'm the only one
exposing fraud not you. Your likewise claims are empty sales rhetoric.
I'd probably find a lot more under your recommended commercial links
probably by the same people you claim have approved your site. I only
hoard tea. You're the tea pimp looking for johns and janes. To bring
others uptodate I've killfiled this website. I don't make empty
threats. You have a HOSTS file on Unix and Windows. You simply enter
the dummy address of 127.0.0.1 for the website. I just visited it once
to make sure I was being plagiarize through a direct link provided by
the webmaster which was obvious my the link name. The website was a
commercial business was from day one. It by a legal definition is an
infomercial where you trust someone to represent a product. No
explicit claims can be made only anecdotal presentation. So if I buy
the product and it doesn't work I can't sue you for fraud. You don't
have to be that blind to know when you're in a room with an elephant.
Anything else I know about the site is said here by others in
particular by the webmaster. This guy will also link IP addresses of
his web traffic to the IP addresses of newsgroup posters claiming
popularity then go looking for your other posts in other groups. I
live by the Las Vegas motto. He also seems to fixated on where you buy
your puer. This guy simply doesn't respect your privacy. When you get
your ass in trouble you want the meaniest, nastiest, and if deep
pockets smartest lawyers like Cockran and Mesereau you can find. In
our metro area you'll need one to sue the state so you can sell your
house which lies in a proposed correidor for state highway development.
No eminent domain just an idea in the planning stage being tossed
around by state agencies probably ten years to the first use of eminent
domain if ever. You'll need one to sue the water district over
existing water rights to replace an existing well. They claim when
your well dries up so does your water rights. They illegally sold your
water rights to a big developer so he could put in a subdivision using
underground water. The next time you're on trial make sure your lawyer
selects jurors who have an antimedia bias. That advice was free. I've
explained my style of posting in the past. I think it interesting you
consider it coy. Sometimes I like to frame it as a murder mystery.
You know the ending but the story is interesting.

Jim

Mike Petro wrote:
> Space Cowboy wrote:
> > I just brought the new guy up to speed so your accusation of
> > intolerance is in context. I first used the term Rosetta stone here
> > while you were an active poster. You change that story every time.
>
> As I said Jim, lame, and rather trollish even. I say Troll because you
> argue anything I have to say, right/left, black/white, even if I said
> the the sun was shining you would argue it. I havent changed my stance
> a bit, you simply change the way you twist the facts.
>
> BTW, just because I was an active poster does NOT mean that I read your
> post, I have been known to ignore and otherwise killfile many of your
> posts due to your high S/N ratio and Ad Hominem attacks.
>
>
> > You're worse than Sasha fishing in other
> > groups for what people said but I stand by that statement because the
> > Supreme Court said I could do it for personal use and not because some
> > vendor tried to keep honest people honest.
>
> So its okay for you to publicly teach people how to defeat copy
> protection but its not ok for me to use the word "Rosetta"? Bit of a
> double standard if you ask me. Your just peeved because you got caught.
>
> > You say public service I
> > say infomercial with commercial links otherwise why not more links that
> > sells puerh?
>
> Umm Jim, to my knowledge, I have the most complete list of vendors who
> sell puerh that exisits in the English language. Show me a more
> complete list and I will stand corrected but I think you are talking
> out of your tail again.
>
> > If you impose the criteria you're selling something. The
> > Charter taken as a whole prohibits commercial posting.
>
> Show me where Jim, in what twisted logic do you get that from, please
> tell me. I quoted the actual charter and I dont see it in there
> anywhere! Since I am not commercial your statement is groundless
> anyway.
>
>
> > We have a
> > hypocrite that accused TeaTalk of using the newsgroup for commercial
> > gain.
>
> Once again you twist the facts, I got on their case for portraying that
> this group was their own property, it was misleading at best. I dont
> care if they linked to it, just portray it for what it is, they tried
> to portray it as being theirs.
>
> If you want to talk about being a hypocrite how about the fact that you
> are now doing the EXACT same thing you criticized me for doing last
> year when you said I should never buy tea off of ebay or the internet.
> Look where you are buying your tea now!
>
> <idiotic drivel sniped>
>
> > I even changed puer sellers on Ebay. Now you can take a guess
> > and blabbermouth who you think that is. You're batting 50/50.
>
> Thats my point, I share information with others, you horde it..... If
> you were truly intersted in contributing to the group you wouldnt be so
> damn coy about everything.
>
> Mike
> www.pu-erh.net

.

Loading