Re: Is raw milk dangerous? `

From: "Paul M. Cook" <pmcook@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 06:47:49 -0700

"A Moose in Love" <parkstreetbooboo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:acfac17d-47c9-4b1c-9bf3-3ed13a855cb0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

I understand that raw milk has a higher probability of containing
pathogens than pasteurized milk.
Can the raw milk not be tested for these pathogens?

All depends on how it is stored. It's not the miit is the vessel. More
people get sick from pasteurized milk every year.

Paul

.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is raw milk dangerous? `
  - From: Hell Toupee

References:
- Is raw milk dangerous? `
  - From: A Moose in Love

Prev by Date: Re: My new toaster arrived!
Next by Date: Re: Rehashing old Salsa Verde Topic
Previous by thread: Re: Is raw milk dangerous? `
Next by thread: Re: Is raw milk dangerous? `
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: Is raw milk dangerous? `
... pathogens than pasteurized milk. ... Can the raw milk not be tested for these pathogens? ... especially a good cheese or ice cream. ...
(rec.food.cooking)
Re: Is raw milk dangerous? `
... pathogens than pasteurized milk. ... Can the raw milk not be tested for these pathogens? ... Pasteurization is a process that is used to destroy naturally occurring pathogens in milk. ...
(rec.food.cooking)
Re: Is raw milk dangerous? `
... Can the raw milk not be tested for these pathogens? ... people get sick from pasteurized milk every year. ... Humans have consumed raw milk for a long time. ...
(rec.food.cooking)
Re: Is raw milk dangerous? `
... pathogens than pasteurized milk. ... Can the raw milk not be tested for these pathogens? ... In answer to your heading: ... Only for those who drink it. ...
(rec.food.cooking)
Is raw milk dangerous? `
... I understand that raw milk has a higher probability of containing ... pathogens than pasteurized milk. ... Can the raw milk not be tested for these pathogens? ...
(rec.food.cooking)