Re: Is raw milk dangerous? `

On Wed, 6 Jun 2012 16:11:11 -0700 (PDT), A Moose in Love
<parkstreetbooboo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I understand that raw milk has a higher probability of containing
pathogens than pasteurized milk.
Can the raw milk not be tested for these pathogens?

Good info here
http://www.realrawmilkfacts.com/raw-milk-hot-topics

Personally, I dislike milk so I don't drink it raw or cooked. Yet I
love most dairy products, especially a good cheese or ice cream.

Sources in the US are listed here
http://www.realmilk.com/
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Is raw milk dangerous? `
    ... Can the raw milk not be tested for these pathogens? ... Raw milk does taste awfully good. ... Pasteurization has saved so many people from illness and even death, ...
    (rec.food.cooking)
  • Re: Is raw milk dangerous? `
    ... Can the raw milk not be tested for these pathogens? ... process that is used to destroy naturally occurring pathogens in milk. ...
    (rec.food.cooking)
  • Re: Is raw milk dangerous? `
    ... Can the raw milk not be tested for these pathogens? ... people get sick from pasteurized milk every year. ... Humans have consumed raw milk for a long time. ...
    (rec.food.cooking)
  • Re: Is raw milk dangerous? `
    ... Can the raw milk not be tested for these pathogens? ... for a relatively smaller amount of $$ and just run each batch of raw ...
    (rec.food.cooking)
  • Digging Deep in the China Study (or how to discredit a vegan)
    ... over the virtues of raw milk. ... agreeing with pearl about the horrible conditions or food animals must ... human plant food and the amount of land that is permanent pasture. ... I countered by saying that raw milk ...
    (sci.med.nutrition)