Re: Jaccard tenderizers (was Re: Perhaps she's correct)
- From: Omelet <ompomelet@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2009 00:36:54 -0500
In article <h7phea$jjn$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Bob Muncie <bob.muncie@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Omelet wrote:
In article <4h50a5h8utm3s3ctl7nqt6nllnpn16pv6s@xxxxxxx>,
sf <sf@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 03 Sep 2009 14:05:42 -0500, Omelet <ompomelet@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
<http://www.tenderizemeat.com/meat-tenderizer-jaccard-meat-tenderizer-p-24Have you noticed those < > thingies that were supposed to stop long
27.html>
urls from breaking don't work?
<sigh> Sometimes they do, sometimes they don't. Depends on the browser.
Would you prefer I tiny URL it? Some people don't like those for some
odd reason.
My thoughts are who cares if they care, as long as it works. I mean if
you were Om, I wouldn't assume you weren't sending me somewhere I should
be, or was dangerous, or NSFW? Now if your name was "Capt. Green Jeans",
*then* I'd be pretty stupid to click on it. But then again, I would have
never clicked on that post in the first place :-)
My only complaint is that tiny URL isn't working yet with the latest and
greatest version of Firefox (I'm using v3.5.2). Clicking on an existing
one yes, creating one, no.
Bob
Thanks Bob!
I generally only try to post reliable stuff with tinyurl. If I'm
posting something offbeat, I'll post it with a warning. <g>
--
Peace! Om
"Human nature seems to be to control other people until they put their foot down."
--Steve Rothstein
recfoodrecipes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subscribe: recfoodrecipes-subscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
.
- References:
- Re: Perhaps she's correct
- From: blake murphy
- Re: Perhaps she's correct
- From: Felice
- Re: Perhaps she's correct
- From: Nancy Young
- Re: Perhaps she's correct
- From: Nancy2
- Re: Perhaps she's correct
- From: Omelet
- Re: Perhaps she's correct
- From: notbob
- Jaccard tenderizers (was Re: Perhaps she's correct)
- From: Omelet
- Re: Jaccard tenderizers (was Re: Perhaps she's correct)
- From: sf
- Re: Jaccard tenderizers (was Re: Perhaps she's correct)
- From: Omelet
- Re: Jaccard tenderizers (was Re: Perhaps she's correct)
- From: sf
- Re: Jaccard tenderizers (was Re: Perhaps she's correct)
- From: Omelet
- Re: Jaccard tenderizers (was Re: Perhaps she's correct)
- From: Bob Muncie
- Re: Perhaps she's correct
- Prev by Date: Re: Holiday cooking
- Next by Date: Re: Jaccard tenderizers (was Re: Perhaps she's correct)
- Previous by thread: Re: Jaccard tenderizers (was Re: Perhaps she's correct)
- Next by thread: Re: Jaccard tenderizers (was Re: Perhaps she's correct)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading