Re: (2009-04-07) NS-RFC: Mugshots on the RFC site
- From: Dan Abel <dabel@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2009 09:57:34 -0700
In article <MPYCl.30909$0%2.2631@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
ChattyCathy <cathy1234@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Becca wrote:
Between December 2007 and February 2009? I dunno, let me check. I'll
be right back...
Your information is correct, and I still agree with me 100%. If I do
not post a message for 2 years, then my photo should be deleted or
moved to a secondary page. When I return, I will submit another photo.
Oh well, looks like the general consensus is to leave them where they
are anyway...
You brought up some interesting issues in your last question. Just how
the heck can any one person tell how long it's been since someone posted
last? Since I retired, I have a lot more time to read this group.
Still, I'll wonder where someone went. I'll do a quick search (and my
server only goes back a couple of months) and find 10 posts? Well, how
could that be? So I'll look at them. Maybe three were about liver. Oh
yeah, I killfiled that thread because I don't eat liver. I'll look at
another one. Oh yeah, I read that post, but I didn't disagree or agree
strongly with it, and it just repeated what four other people had
posted, so I skimmed it without noticing who the author was. This has
happened to me a couple of times.
There are people who post without reading, which is kind of irrelevant,
but people who read but seldom post *are* relevant. It's not fair to
bump them off the page if they consider themselves to be a "member" of
this group.
--
Dan Abel
Petaluma, California USA
dabel@xxxxxxxxx
"[Don't] assume that someone is "broken" just because they behave in ways
you don't like or don't understand." --Miche
.
- References:
- (2009-04-07) NS-RFC: Mugshots on the RFC site
- From: ChattyCathy
- Re: (2009-04-07) NS-RFC: Mugshots on the RFC site
- From: Andy
- Re: (2009-04-07) NS-RFC: Mugshots on the RFC site
- From: sf
- Re: (2009-04-07) NS-RFC: Mugshots on the RFC site
- From: Becca
- Re: (2009-04-07) NS-RFC: Mugshots on the RFC site
- From: ChattyCathy
- Re: (2009-04-07) NS-RFC: Mugshots on the RFC site
- From: Becca
- Re: (2009-04-07) NS-RFC: Mugshots on the RFC site
- From: ChattyCathy
- (2009-04-07) NS-RFC: Mugshots on the RFC site
- Prev by Date: Poll: Cuisinart or Kitchenaid
- Next by Date: Re: OT 13 dead
- Previous by thread: Re: (2009-04-07) NS-RFC: Mugshots on the RFC site
- Next by thread: Re: (2009-04-07) NS-RFC: Mugshots on the RFC site
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading