Re: That binaries thing.
- From: sf <sf@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 00:46:19 -0600
On Sat, 10 Jan 2009 08:33:54 -0800, in rec.food.cooking, sf wrote:
On Fri, 9 Jan 2009 23:54:34 -0600, sf <sf.usenet@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, 09 Jan 2009 20:44:03 -0800, in rec.food.cooking, sf wrote:
On 9 Jan 2009 21:14:43 GMT, "Default User" <defaultuserbr@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Dan Abel wrote:That's not the real point... that the stalkers haven't been KFed by
In article <0lbem4pchhp0e402i1kl1i1mj8oaafp0ls@xxxxxxx>,
Christine Dabney <artisan2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Just stop. You are losing whatever friends you ever had here....
You really should check to see who you are replying to before you
post this much.
Just boggles my mind that some regulars are unable to tell the
difference at this stage of the game.
this time. They are pretty easy to notice. I've been fooled, but
it's the old "fool me twice" thing. Hopefully if I was fooled a third
time, I noticed and kill filed the bloomin bastid.
You're the brightest bulb in the pack aren't you?
And you're an *** many times over.
How many times is that?
.
- References:
- That binaries thing.
- From: Chemiker
- Re: That binaries thing.
- From: Peter Lucas
- Re: That binaries thing.
- From: Peter Lucas
- Re: That binaries thing.
- From: Ophelia
- Re: That binaries thing.
- From: Christine Dabney
- Re: That binaries thing.
- From: Christine Dabney
- Re: That binaries thing.
- From: Dan Abel
- Re: That binaries thing.
- From: Default User
- Re: That binaries thing.
- From: sf
- Re: That binaries thing.
- From: sf
- Re: That binaries thing.
- From: sf
- That binaries thing.
- Prev by Date: Re: Enough is Enough
- Next by Date: Re: Digital cameras
- Previous by thread: Re: That binaries thing.
- Next by thread: Re: That binaries thing.
- Index(es):