Re: That binaries thing.

In article <0lbem4pchhp0e402i1kl1i1mj8oaafp0ls@xxxxxxx>,
Christine Dabney <artisan2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Fri, 09 Jan 2009 03:53:51 -0700, Christine Dabney
<artisan2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Fri, 9 Jan 2009 10:45:34 -0000, "Ophelia" <Ophelia@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:



BECAUSE WE ARE NOT INTERESTED AND DOING THIS, YOU ARE AS BAD AS THEM!!!!



Agreed. Just stop responding Peter. Please, for the sake of RFC.
Please.

Christine.

And Peter, you are risking getting into a lot of killfiles that people
are not wanting to put you in. Just cause.

That is now ending. You are driving this vendetta...and it aint
pretty.

This is pretty silly, Christine. You and Ophelia are preaching to the
stalker. If you put them in your kill file, Peter will be happy.

I for one, am reaching my tolerance for this. For the sake of rfc,
please halt this. Please.. Those of us who can read and are
intelligent, we know how to read headers, and we know when it is you.
But lately we don;t care if it is you, cause we are sick and tired of
you chasing this down.

Just stop. You are losing whatever friends you ever had here....

You really should check to see who you are replying to before you post
this much.

Another handy hint, is that not only is the stalker posting using a
different address, they have been using the following .sig:

If we are not meant to eat ***, why are they made of meat?

--
Dan Abel
Petaluma, California USA
dabel@xxxxxxxxx
.

Quantcast