Re: Welfare babies,
- From: Saerah Gray <anisaerah@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 00:20:24 GMT
Dave Smith <adavid.smith@xxxxxxxxxxxx> fnord
news:48cda6f3$0$7411$9a6e19ea@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
Saerah Gray wrote:
I make less than that 28 G raise, and while we don't go without
anything basic, I don't have room in my budget for much in the way of
extras or savings. I don't know how anyone making minimum wage
(currently about half of what I make per hour) gets by at all.
I can sympathize. My point was that, while blocking increases in the
federal minimum wage, the same legislative body voted themselves a
number of raises that amounted to more than double the annual wage of
minimum wage workers, and of course the raises were on top of the
hefty salaries they were already making.
Oh, I got your point. I was just expounding on it from the point of view
of someone who makes a lot more than minimum wage (or what one wouild
receive on AFDC), but is still basically just getting by.
--
Saerah
"Welcome to Usenet, Biatch! Adapt or haul ass!"
- some hillbilly from FL
.
- References:
- Welfare babies, greasy diners and other tidbits
- From: James Nasium
- Re: Welfare babies,
- From: Orlando Enrique Fiol
- Re: Welfare babies,
- From: Dave Smith
- Re: Welfare babies,
- From: Wayne Boatwright
- Re: Welfare babies,
- From: Saerah Gray
- Re: Welfare babies,
- From: Edwin Pawlowski
- Re: Welfare babies,
- From: Dave Smith
- Re: Welfare babies,
- From: Saerah Gray
- Re: Welfare babies,
- From: Dave Smith
- Welfare babies, greasy diners and other tidbits
- Prev by Date: Re: Welfare babies,
- Next by Date: Re: Welfare babies,
- Previous by thread: Re: Welfare babies,
- Next by thread: Re: Welfare babies,
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|