Re: Pad Thai anyone
- From: "Paul M. Cook" <pmcook@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 23:51:03 GMT
"notbob" <notbob@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:KC_Aj.27547$yQ6.23038@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 2008-03-09, Paul M. Cook <pmcook@xxxxxxx> wrote:
enough, just what will satisfy you?
You substantiating your claims. Not my job.
Uh, yes it is. If you say "no it isn't" then you'd best have some evidence.
In a cour of law the burden of proof is on the prsecution. Otherwise you
just come across as a mud slinger with no leg to stand on.
Gee, I dunno.
We can tell.
That would be the imperial form of we, I take it?
Paul
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Pad Thai anyone
- From: notbob
- Re: Pad Thai anyone
- References:
- Pad Thai anyone
- From: Paul M. Cook
- Re: Pad Thai anyone
- From: notbob
- Re: Pad Thai anyone
- From: Paul M. Cook
- Re: Pad Thai anyone
- From: notbob
- Re: Pad Thai anyone
- From: Paul M. Cook
- Re: Pad Thai anyone
- From: notbob
- Re: Pad Thai anyone
- From: Paul M. Cook
- Re: Pad Thai anyone
- From: notbob
- Re: Pad Thai anyone
- From: Paul M. Cook
- Re: Pad Thai anyone
- From: notbob
- Re: Pad Thai anyone
- From: Paul M. Cook
- Re: Pad Thai anyone
- From: notbob
- Pad Thai anyone
- Prev by Date: Re: Pad Thai anyone
- Next by Date: Re: Pad Thai anyone
- Previous by thread: Re: Pad Thai anyone
- Next by thread: Re: Pad Thai anyone
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|