Re: Please be careful renaming threads!
- From: "James Silverton" <not.jim.silverton@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 18:04:53 GMT
<sf> wrote in message news:f509c31p2mhl7g58vm6ig3hbrvjco5849s@xxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 11:25:39 -0400, Goomba38 <Goomba38@xxxxxxxxxxx>Many people, like myself, use an obvious misspelling. It's really only meant to beat spamming robot programs not someone who really wishes to get in touch and I have found it quite satisfactory.
wrote:
Some people think they are being smart by putting up totally
inaccessible addresses. I think it's downright juvenal in this day
and age. ISPs allow multiple mailboxes and there is a slew of web
based email like gmail, hotmail, yahoo etc, so there is no need to
munge anymore. The best idea of course is to hide your address so
that it's not up for public view, but even the most net savvy posters
here don't seem to have a clue.
--
Jim Silverton
Potomac, Maryland
.
- References:
- Please be careful renaming threads!
- From: Karen AKA Kajikit
- Re: Please be careful renaming threads!
- From: mooncup
- Re: Please be careful renaming threads!
- From: Goomba38
- Re: Please be careful renaming threads!
- From: sf
- Please be careful renaming threads!
- Prev by Date: Re: Too close for comfort...
- Next by Date: Re: Scone recipe for working mums
- Previous by thread: Re: Please be careful renaming threads!
- Next by thread: Re: Please be careful renaming threads!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|