Re: OMG it's ~xxx~!!!!!!!!!

~patches~ wrote:
sarah bennett wrote:

~patches~ wrote:



Not at all Lefty. I've stole nothing. I merely said what I've seen and now I can't remember where I saw it at. Old age and all :(


not an hour or two ago, you said you knew exactly where the pics were but you would not post the urls. Now, I cannot see how I could be embarassed by any of this if the pictures are so hard to find. But threatening to distribute pictures of someone's child to pornographers is illegal.


No threats :) Your paranoia is showing!

Saying :"oh, but that's not a threat" does not make it not a threat.




If it were me your ass would be grass -- I would contact every appropriate
authority and press intimidation charges against you. At the very least you
might be expelled from your ISP, or Google, or whatever, but police might
want to take your computer for a while, it might cost you a biundle of money
for attorneys; I would be sure it made the local papers in your area, then
I would sue you.




No intimidation no nothing. Sarah wanted to continue this and anyone looking at the record will see who was wrong by stealing someone else's pic and uploading it to a website against their wishes. Something that was blatently done then rubbed into my face over and over. That I hit back and she took things out of context is not my problem. The police are more than welcomed to my computer. I have nothing to hide.


even you email address book? the contents of your yahoo group? seriously, call your doctor and get back on your meds.


Are you fucking nuts? Of course not! Unlike you I'm not paranoid and I don't post pics of my kids. Now you by your own words invited others to use your pics. You *gave* permission directly online meaning fair game including any pics on your website. Do I care anymore, no. Did I do anything, no. Do you have any proof other than my ranting on a ng, no. Nothing! Check with your lawyer friend and get the definition of *nothing*. If you can *prove* I as in me uploaded any of your pics anywhere then prove it complete with urls. I will tell you though you will be hearing from me really shortly through my lawyer if you keep up with the *you did whatever* posts. Either you prove I did anything or you STFU!


You posted numerous times that you variably a) could b) would c) encouraged others to post my childs pictures with my address and phone number. Its all there in the archives. I never gave permission for my pictures to be used for illegal purposes. I cannot prove you uploaded my pics anywhere, but assuming they are out there, you have admitted to instigating that action. Have your lawyer contact me, fine. I'm not sure what you think that is going to accomplish, but hell.




You go beyond any semblance of civility, and, speaking as a parent, I think
you are about as loathesome a creature as ever slithered out from under an
outhouse. Only a true creep would threaten somebody's kid. I hope Sarah
pursues this legally and nails your scuzzy ass to the wall.




Thanks but I'm busy cooking. Want to hear about it?








--

saerah

http://anisaerah.cmayes.net/blog/

email:
anisaerah at s b c global.net

Adam Bowman wrote:
>I always wonder when someone brings up a point about Bush, and you
> then bring up something that Clinton did, are you saying they are both
> wrong? Because that's all it points out to me, places where they both
> messed up. It doesn't negate the fact that Bush did wrong; was that
> your intention?
>
> That type of argument is like
>
> "Bob shot someone"
>
> "Yeah, but don't you remember when Don hit that guy with a bat?"
>
.