Re: Post your Recipes - with step by step photos

Dee Randall wrote:

"~patches~" <noones_home@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:11q60vvt2pkf14f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Dee Randall wrote:


"~patches~" <noones_home@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:11q5raoo0ei1m97@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


biig wrote:


~patches~ wrote:



S'mee wrote:




One time on Usenet, damselicious@xxxxxxxxx said:




On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 04:00:02 GMT, sarah bennett
<anisaerah@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:




~patches~ wrote:


No Michael, at no time did I post an actual pic to this newsgroup. The
only thing I posted was links where one could if they so chose to click
on see the pics. So there was no confusion on my part. I've been
around usenet long enough to know the difference between binary and
non-binary. The uproar was regarding the posting of links to tinypic
links to pics of food I cooked and wanted to share. According to some
here, posting of links to pics is *not* acceptable so I have refrained

from doing so. 

I read that entire thread, and I do not remember anyone saying this.
Link please?


One word.  Sheldon.

I liked the pictures, and so did a lot of other people. Someone has a
martyr complex. 


I'm glad I'm not the only one who noticed...



Whatever, let it go, I have and I don't have a martyr complexs.  I'm
ticked but I will get over it.  Nuff said.



Patches, I enjoyed your pics.  There is no reason to stop posting the
links.  No one has to click on them....<smile>....Sharon

Thanks Sharon :) I enjoyed sharing them. I'm not one to enjoy disharmony or insults so for now I'll refrain from posting links to pics of food.

At the moment, I'm heavily into genealogy waiting eons for images to load. The availabilty of the 1911 census online is wonderful but it is only searchable by location so it is really slow going. Most of the sub districts have 10 - 20 images, all that must be downloaded and painfully read through :( I hate dial-up! While the images are loading, I planning dinner and debating whether to make a few batches of cookies for Christmas. I can't believe we are so close to the holidays! I'm planning on making a batch or two of fudge later today for gift giving. We don't eat fudge ourselves but I've been told the fudge I make is quite good. We are supposed to visit friends tomorrow. They just moved so I'm wondering what I can make as a home warming present. I'm leaning towards homemade bread, jam, and a hot chocolate mix with nice mugs tucked into a wicker basket and wrapped in tea towels.


Patches, do you have library on-line privileges where you are? (I can't recall if you are in Canada or not.)
Dee Dee

Dee, I'm in Canada. I can download some images from the National Archives which is really nice if I didn't have dial-up but still cheaper than travelling. I finally got a sub to ancestry.com that I really like too. It saves a lot of leg work but for what I'm doing I still need to see the actual records. Still it saves the travel costs of narrowing the sources down.


Your mentioning the 19911 census led me to wonder if you have access to 1910. Is your interest in the 1911 census just the fact that it is a confirmation or you might be looking for someone that wasn't in the 1910 census?
Lots of libraries in the U.S. have access to Heritage Quest. It is free to anyone with a library card signing up at the library and viewing at home. I find the download many times faster than ancestry. Saving to desktop has been many times faster for HQ than ancestry. I've been a subscriber for many years now to ancestry. Both are good.
Dee Dee



Dee, the 1911 census is for Canada not the US. Census records in genealogy are important for determining where your ancestor was but really they just provide a stepping stone, something many doing genealogy don't understand. That is, while you can show someone was living in a particular location at that time, you really can't take things like the DOB as gosbel. I'm accessing the 1911 census through the National Archives not Acestry but it is really slow going because it isn't indexed by surname only location. I've been into this hard core for numerous years and quite often travel througout North America and Europe simply to get a tid bit of info or a pic. It's really nice there are more images of actual records available online. I don't mind paying for the info either. I like Ancestry. I've checked out Heritage but only briefly so I best check it out again.
.

Quantcast