Re: "RFC Chat" is fun, but it has no rules about posting anonymously"
- From: Melba's Jammin' <barbs.challer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 10:58:26 -0600
In article <dlsgeu$pbt$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Nancy Young" <qwerty@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> "nancree" <nancree@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:1132573176.727216.174280@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Someone has been posting a "new rule" about RFC, that posting
> > anonymously is no longer allowed. I choose not to post anonymously,
> > but no one should be deciding what the rules should be. It is an open
> > forum. No one can appoint themselves Chief Rule-Maker.
>
> I hate to tell you, yes, they can.
>
> > Do join in and post however you wish. It's more fun when you also
> > post your name, but it is not necessary. Sometimes a little privacy
> > is a wonderful thing.
>
> It's rude to sit there and just listen.
Why?
> nancy
--
http://www.jamlady.eboard.com, updated 11-19-05 - Shiksa Varnishkes.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: "RFC Chat" is fun, but it has no rules about posting anonymously"
- Next by Date: Re: Christmas question?
- Previous by thread: Re: "RFC Chat" is fun, but it has no rules about posting anonymously"
- Next by thread: Re: "RFC Chat" is fun, but it has no rules about posting anonymously"
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|