Re: Spot at least 50 riding errors
- From: AKogler <akogler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 18:18:24 -0800 (PST)
On Nov 29, 10:33 am, Ocean of Nuance <lizzardwomanRM...@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Because you jumped all over me. It is the same reason the second thread
got deleted... you jumoed all over me. I noticed you didn't pos
=;-D!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I asked if you had read Racinet in the first one. That was it! And I
pointed out that you were being underhanded in the one about Cindi. My
language was calm, my font normal.
The sad thing is Sharon that you protest, but so many people here saw
the exchanges, and not one, not one agrees with you.
Well, when two experienced dressage trainers disagree and one explains
why they think you are wrong, and even a mealy mouthed beginner knows
why some of it at least is wrong, shouldn't that at least give you pause?
Nope. Not a whit. I am quite secure thank you and know more than most.
You dont know them any better actually than you know me, you just
'like' them, so they are 'right'. This is very characteristic of you.
I know. I want it for Christmas.
Buy it now, I cant wait for that retraction and apology.
In other words, you learned nothing about horse training in that exchange..
No, I did not learn anything from them in that exchange. I did not
agree with them and think they are wrong. So what?
Were you banned or not?
I was indeed banned but not for the post you claim it was and not for
the reason you constantly mention.
I never said it was the Cindi one or any one, I know which one it was.
Sheesh, seriously what difference does it make?! It was the one where
you took a quote from someone about moving up the ranks a year at a
time.
Again, no clue.
About what?!
I wont have to. I know how to behave, I know how to pleasantly
disagree, and I know whereof I speak. Unlike you.
YOU were responsible for getting those two threads deleted. I didn't
hear word one from the moderators over either incident. I suspect you
were temporarily banned after the second and possibly also after the first.
Nope, neither time. Your gigantic red font and bizarre freakout name
calling did it. EVERYONE who saw it took you to task. Sharon Potter
saw it, Ruth saw it, Deb Brownell saw it. Many others. Not ONE
supported you, all condemned you. Both times.
You did clean up your posts after the second time to your credit.
I couldnt clean them up; they were never dirty.
You are such a piece of work! Do you ever quit blaming and dancing on
pinheads? Do you ever admit that you have a problem with..er...social
skills?! Even when 100 out of 100 will tell you you are mistaken, must
you still prevaricate?!
Abby
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Spot at least 50 riding errors
- From: Jane Saranac
- Re: Spot at least 50 riding errors
- References:
- Spot at least 50 riding errors
- From: Ocean of Nuance
- Re: Spot at least 50 riding errors
- From: betsey
- Re: Spot at least 50 riding errors
- From: eva
- Re: Spot at least 50 riding errors
- From: Ocean of Nuance
- Re: Spot at least 50 riding errors
- From: eva
- Re: Spot at least 50 riding errors
- From: Ocean of Nuance
- Re: Spot at least 50 riding errors
- From: AKogler
- Re: Spot at least 50 riding errors
- From: Ocean of Nuance
- Re: Spot at least 50 riding errors
- From: AKogler
- Re: Spot at least 50 riding errors
- From: Ocean of Nuance
- Re: Spot at least 50 riding errors
- From: AKogler
- Re: Spot at least 50 riding errors
- From: Ocean of Nuance
- Spot at least 50 riding errors
- Prev by Date: Re: OT - Herding Hog in Texas
- Next by Date: Re: Spot at least 50 riding errors
- Previous by thread: Re: Spot at least 50 riding errors
- Next by thread: Re: Spot at least 50 riding errors
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|