Re: romal versus split reins?
- From: Ocean of Nuance <lizzardwomanRMOVE@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 08:52:32 -0400
Joyce Reynolds-Ward wrote:
On Thu, 29 May 2008 22:37:21 -0400, Ocean of Nuance
<lizzardwomanRMOVE@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Sharon Potter wrote:Ocean of Nuance wrote:But double bridle dressage, being ridden on contact and all, utilizes both bits in different ways.
Then why not stay in the hackamore?Pretty much for the same reason dressage horses move from the snaffle to the full bridle....
Thanks in advance.
sharon
What I understand Tamara to be saying is that the finished western horse in the spade bit with whatever reins, you don't touch the bit/face at all.
Totally different no?
No, the difference is a subtleness in the signal.
So there are rein aids? How can you do that with a looped rein?
sharon
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: romal versus split reins?
- From: Joyce Reynolds-Ward
- Re: romal versus split reins?
- From: John Hasler
- Re: romal versus split reins?
- References:
- romal versus split reins?
- From: betsey
- Re: romal versus split reins?
- From: Tamara in TN
- Re: romal versus split reins?
- From: cindi
- Re: romal versus split reins?
- From: Allison
- Re: romal versus split reins?
- From: Ocean of Nuance
- Re: romal versus split reins?
- From: Sharon Potter
- Re: romal versus split reins?
- From: Ocean of Nuance
- Re: romal versus split reins?
- From: Joyce Reynolds-Ward
- romal versus split reins?
- Prev by Date: Re: romal versus split reins?
- Next by Date: Re: romal versus split reins?
- Previous by thread: Re: romal versus split reins?
- Next by thread: Re: romal versus split reins?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|