Re: To t/o or not to t/o, that is my question! ARGH!
- From: Aunt Nasty <ye_olde_muleskinner@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 08:58:41 -0400
On 16 Jun 2007 12:35:27 GMT, Ken Brown <yeahright@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
.. I am asking that
that proves.
It proves you can't stand facts when they're
not presented by the 'right' messenger.
People who keep horses should be aware of the
local laws regarding that activity.
And this proves what? The law defines *proper* behavior?
It can be inhumane to deprive livestock of access
to suitable shelter. It can also be illegal. Those
who keep horses should know about both in
order to avoid problems.
I do know that and my question remains unanswered: what does the fact that
some areas make X behavior illegal *prove*?
People could get fined for failing to abide by the
laws, though the important part is that humane
treatment of livestock should be encouraged to
prevent violations.
... fuzzy-headed and addled ...
That explains why you attempt to use fallacy
rather than argue rationally.
liberal brain ...
Hitler, Stalin, and you hate liberals, no doubt
for their brains.
grappling with the concepts of liberty ...
Do you support those who arrest people on
public sidewalks for carrying posters?
and individual responsibility
Do you not believe that the horse caretaker
has the responsibility to provide shelter when
it's needed for the wellbeing of the stock as
well as when required by law?
(not
to mention individual freedon
Do you claim that you dislike that which impinges
on individual freedom?
...simple ...
Your efforts are excessively so.
Now post something of substance, Oh Liberal Tree Shaker.
I'm definitely a conservative, and you're definitely
unable to manage the substance so far, Ken.
On 15 Jun 2007 23:16:42 GMT, Ken Brown <yeahright@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Aunt Nasty <ye_olde_muleskinner@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in news:6ro473pjilol1lbk5nnhrno0htdd12sp7h@xxxxxxx:
The fact remains that those who refuse to
provide shelter for horses in some areas are
subject to penalties for that.
And this proves what?
Well, it was already proven that you'll post to try
to disagree with known facts just to embarrass
yourself in public, Ken.
It's a fact that it's illegal to deprive such livestock
as horses of shelter in some areas.
That is something a person reading a newsgroup
about things equestrian may want to know.
On 14 Jun 2007 20:54:18 GMT, Ken Brown <yeahright@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Too bad it's not illegal to post drivel
You'd have time for something else, then?
...nonsense.
It's all you have, isn't it, Ken.
The fact remains that those who refuse to
provide shelter for horses in some areas are
subject to penalties for that.
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 10:55:45 -0700, JC Dill <jcdill@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
.... If the field has
hills (and valleys) and trees, and the climate is mild, there's
nothing wrong with letting the horses take advantage of this natural
shelter instead of building an artificial one.
In some places it's illegal to deprive such livestock of shelter.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: To t/o or not to t/o, that is my question! ARGH!
- From: Ken Brown
- Re: To t/o or not to t/o, that is my question! ARGH!
- References:
- To t/o or not to t/o, that is my question! ARGH!
- From: JJ
- Re: To t/o or not to t/o, that is my question! ARGH!
- From: RPM1
- Re: To t/o or not to t/o, that is my question! ARGH!
- From: JC Dill
- Re: To t/o or not to t/o, that is my question! ARGH!
- From: Aunt Nasty
- Re: To t/o or not to t/o, that is my question! ARGH!
- From: Ken Brown
- Re: To t/o or not to t/o, that is my question! ARGH!
- From: Aunt Nasty
- Re: To t/o or not to t/o, that is my question! ARGH!
- From: Ken Brown
- Re: To t/o or not to t/o, that is my question! ARGH!
- From: Aunt Nasty
- Re: To t/o or not to t/o, that is my question! ARGH!
- From: Ken Brown
- To t/o or not to t/o, that is my question! ARGH!
- Prev by Date: Re: To t/o or not to t/o, that is my question! ARGH!
- Next by Date: Re: Ontopic - The Horse Industry Is Not Immune From General Economic Conditions
- Previous by thread: Re: To t/o or not to t/o, that is my question! ARGH!
- Next by thread: Re: To t/o or not to t/o, that is my question! ARGH!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|