Re: sort of OT: range of guns

In article <C0A32F76.2E92F%clayridgefarm@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
"J. Z. M." <clayridgefarm@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 5/31/06 9:50 AM, "wkambic@xxxxxxx" wrote:

On Wed, 31 May 2006 13:10:40 GMT, "jsaranac" <jsalacious@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:


That was my reaction as well... cindi doesn't strike me as the kind of
person who'd call people crazy simply because they fire a gun. I'm
guessing
if they weren't already showing signs of a little crazy in other ways
she'd
not be quite as worried about their gun use.

Ah, this is the woman who has been "victimized" by every equine buyer,
seller, vet, farrier, feed store opeator, butcher, baker, and
candlestick maker in the Golden State. "Half ***" appears to be her
normal position.


All this conjecture is a moot point. The neighbor should not be shooting in
an area where animals live at pasture. Period.

Actually, you're *WAY* off base on that statement. In too many ways to
count.

It does not matter what his
brain, or lack of brain's present state is, the shooting is not appropriate.

What matters is this, and ONLY this: Is he shooting at/toward the
critters at pasture?" If the answer is "no", then he's perfectly fine
unless some other restricting factor is "in play". His smarts, or lack
of them, don't count.

Cindi, call the cops. Find out what the law is in your area. Sic him.

Way to start an all-out war...

--
Don Bruder - dakidd@xxxxxxxxx - If your "From:" address isn't on my whitelist,
or the subject of the message doesn't contain the exact text "PopperAndShadow"
somewhere, any message sent to this address will go in the garbage without my
ever knowing it arrived. Sorry... <http://www.sonic.net/~dakidd> for more info
.

Quantcast