Re: No more back shoes
- From: J. B. Levin <levinjb@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2005 08:51:40 GMT
In <mqtrj1pmovqhb31nosqa3095is9bh82qol@xxxxxxx>,
wkambic@xxxxxxx wrote:
}On Fri, 30 Sep 2005 20:43:13 -0500, John Hasler <john@xxxxxxxxxx>
}wrote:
}>Deism postulated a "prime mover" that inititated the universe and took no
}>active interest in it thereafter: closer to the big bang than to the
}>personal god of Christianity.
}> It died out as open atheism became
}>respectable.
}
}Why? The two are hardly the same.
Only to the extent that you differentiate a "prime mover" from the "big
bang". Once the "pm" loses interest, the results of either are
indistinguishable.
/JBL
--
| Nets: levinjb@xxxxxxxxx
| ARS : KD1ON/7
| POTS: (520)424-9075
| USPS: PO Box 478, Maricopa, AZ 85239
.
- References:
- Re: No more back shoes
- From: wkambic
- Re: No more back shoes
- From: John Hasler
- Re: No more back shoes
- From: John Hasler
- Re: No more back shoes
- From: wkambic
- Re: No more back shoes
- Prev by Date: Re: Does context matter?
- Next by Date: Re: No more back shoes
- Previous by thread: Re: No more back shoes
- Next by thread: Re: No more back shoes
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|