Re: Very OT - ethics/Mouse/etc
- From: Joyce Reynolds-Ward <jrw@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 08:18:21 -0700
On Wed, 17 Aug 2005 09:17:14 -0400, "Cricket" <ccole@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
snip
>Heck, we occasionally even get pagan "fundies", we just don't have a book
>they can wave at you
>and use as "proof". Some folks have a saying - "Fundies are fundies",
>meaning it's a trait that hooks onto
>what it can, and if there was no Christianity (or Islam, or whatever) they'd
>find some other "proof" that
>they knew better than you, and spend all their spare time trying to shove it
>in your face. Having a book
>just makes their job a little easier. ;>)
Cricket, how very true!
jrw
.
- References:
- Re: Very OT - ethics
- From: cindi
- Re: Very OT - ethics/Mouse/etc
- From: akogler
- Re: Very OT - ethics/Mouse/etc
- From: Eileen Morgan
- Re: Very OT - ethics/Mouse/etc
- From: akogler
- Re: Very OT - ethics/Mouse/etc
- From: Ruth Baltopoulos
- Re: Very OT - ethics/Mouse/etc
- From: akogler
- Re: Very OT - ethics/Mouse/etc
- From: Eileen Morgan
- Re: Very OT - ethics/Mouse/etc
- From: Joyce Reynolds-Ward
- Re: Very OT - ethics/Mouse/etc
- From: Eileen Morgan
- Re: Very OT - ethics/Mouse/etc
- From: Cricket
- Re: Very OT - ethics
- Prev by Date: Re: Apology (was Re: Very OT)
- Next by Date: Re: Madonna falls off horse, breaks collarbone etc
- Previous by thread: Re: Very OT - ethics/Mouse/etc
- Next by thread: Re: Very OT - ethics/Mouse/etc
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading