Re: Fining with both + and - agents.
- From: "Wino-Nouveau" <trapbum@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 5 Jan 2006 14:59:35 -0800
John,
RE: Searches: I rarely need to ask a question on this site. I always
find a wealth of information when I do a search ... there's more info
than one can imagine. I have never
gotten thousands of postings but sometimes hundreds ( the seach only
takes a few seconds.) However, I generally find enough info after
reading a dozen or so major postings (sorted by most recent posting
date). But I'm usually so facinated that I keep reading more of them
for an hour or so anyway (I find new wine information addictive).
RE: Isinglass. People appear to be getting good results with either
the bentonite/isinglass or the bentonite/sparkaloid combinations for
their white wines. I didn't see anything that would change my mind
about trying isinglass. I plan to purchase a small supply of both the
powder and liquid forms ... I understand the liquid is easier to use
and quicker to clear but that the powder is more economical. I've used
the bentonite/sparkaloid combination with good resutls.
RE: Timing of additions: I understood that it is quite acceptable to
add both the - and + agents at basically the same time. No need to
rack after using one before using the other. THOROUGH stirring was
stressed as being very inportant.
Hope this helps ... I'll let everyone know which isinglass (powder or
liquid) I like best after I use them.
Roger L. Pelletier, Aurora, NE USA
.
- References:
- Fining with both + and - agents.
- From: Wino-Nouveau
- Re: Fining with both + and - agents.
- From: Wino-Nouveau
- Re: Fining with both + and - agents.
- From: John Price
- Fining with both + and - agents.
- Prev by Date: multi-berry wines?
- Next by Date: Re: Bottle Shock
- Previous by thread: Re: Fining with both + and - agents.
- Next by thread: Re: MY SUMMER TOMATO WINE
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading