Re: history
- From: Sally Swindells <sally_swindells@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 18:42:28 +0000 (UTC)
On Sat, 17 Sep 2005 12:16:23 -0500, "teleflora"
<teleflora@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>"KJ" <KJoger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>news:plXWe.364474$xm3.106823@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>>I see it's a little behind. I wonder if it's inactive now. The data is
>>only up to last April. Is that usual? I thought we were informed of our
>>verbosity (is that a word?) after each month. It is fun to look at though.
>
>Yeah, when the link came up as 2003, it was like a blast from the past!
>Where did a lot of those people go?
>
>Cindy
>
There's a little place to enter the 'up to' date in. I'm on the list
so it must be fairly up to date! There's also a bit with boxes to
'dot' to choose monthly or yearly.
--
Sally at the Seaside~~~~~~~
http://community.webshots.com/user/sallyswin
.
- References:
- history
- From: KJ
- Re: history
- From: Diana Curtis
- Re: history
- From: KJ
- Re: history
- From: teleflora
- history
- Prev by Date: Re: OT Rant about posts
- Next by Date: Re: STASH RAID
- Previous by thread: Re: history
- Next by thread: Re: history
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|