Re: Spelling, grammar and getting it right was Re: OFF TOPIC funny
- From: Susan Hartman <susan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 09:37:52 -0500
ellice wrote:
I think Quark is pretty much the publishing industry standard, though some
people use InDesign. It's so much fun playing with layouts - but it's easy
to kind of obsess.
It used to be Quark, but not any more....people have *flocked* to InDesign. It's much cheaper, interfaces better with other programs, and once you're over an initial hurdle, is easy to use. The most frustrating thing about the changeover was that it calls things by different names than Quark, and it was hard to look up something you didn't know the name for in help! But that didn't last long.
InDesign is SO much better in text flow. I used to spend hours fiddling with Quark files to get the text "just so" (good Virgo that I am, LOL!) -- lining up columns, getting past bad line breaks, etc. etc. - that InDesign does much better from the get-go.
Sue
--
Susan Hartman/Dirty Linen
The Magazine of Folk and World Music
www.dirtylinen.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Magazines revisited
- Next by Date: Re: OT Weird weather was Re: Dolphy is DONE
- Previous by thread: Re: Spelling, grammar and getting it right was Re: OFF TOPIC funny
- Next by thread: Re: Spelling, grammar and getting it right was Re: OFF TOPIC funny
- Index(es):