Re: OT: I have a question for you.
- From: "Mavia Beaulieu" <mavia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 15:57:28 GMT
"lucretia borgia" <lucretiaborgia@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:654r721fk7s6hvhp1kmmquh2b628ou2927@xxxxxxxxxx
"Sharon" <clancyc@xxxxxxxxxx>,in rec.crafts.textiles.needleworkwrote:
and entertained us with
I didn't really know if these *Ambassadors* got paid or not - now I
know. I realize that she had that job before Brad and that the
beautiful people really can raise money and concern for such causes -
it's a good thing for sure. I was just making a half-assed joke about
no job offer for me - really I was. :-))
Sharon (N.B.)
Maybe we could give you a seat in the Senate instead - that way you
could keep it till you die, get paid an exorbitant wage - and stay
home as well lol
If Harper's latest proposal for Senate reform is approved, new Senators will
only have an 8 year term. This I'm sure is long enough to qualify for a
hefty pension...enough to keep you in stash for the rest of your stitching
days! :))
Mavia
.
- References:
- Re: OT: I have a question for you.
- From: Jangchub
- Re: OT: I have a question for you.
- From: bhill705
- Re: OT: I have a question for you.
- From: Jangchub
- Re: OT: I have a question for you.
- From: Lucille
- Re: OT: I have a question for you.
- From: Jangchub
- Re: OT: I have a question for you.
- From: Linda D .
- Re: OT: I have a question for you.
- From: Jangchub
- Re: OT: I have a question for you.
- From: Sharon
- Re: OT: I have a question for you.
- From: Dr. Brat
- Re: OT: I have a question for you.
- From: Sharon
- Re: OT: I have a question for you.
- Prev by Date: Re: STILL OT - back to the name thing Re: OT: I have a question for you.
- Next by Date: Re: STILL OT - back to the name thing Re: OT: I have a question for you.
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: I have a question for you.
- Next by thread: Re: OT: I have a question for you.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|