Re: OT: I have a question for you.
- From: Jangchub <sakadawa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 15:23:48 GMT
On Wed, 31 May 2006 11:13:15 -0400, "Lucille"
<lucillez1nospamallowed@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
For heaven's sake, Tom Cruise and Katy Holmes had more privacy with the
birth of their baby in Los Angeles than they did. And Brook Shields gave
birth in Los Angeles, and some other star gave birth a few days ago.
Privacy also includes the speculation people love to do. Why people
have this need to hate celebrities is something I will never
understand. Personally, I prefer I never knew anything about a
celebrities life and character. It makes it very hard to suspend
disbelief when they are on the silver screen acting.
No matter how noble the cause, they looked for publicity and they got
publicity. It seems this was a planned c section and they brought the
doctor with them to do it. If they truly wanted privacy I think they could
have found it somewhere in the enormous span of the United States.
She wanted to baby to have dual citizenship.
Some friends of mine are the parents of Darren Aranofsky, a Hollywood
writer/producer who is engaged to a very pregnant Rachel Weicz, a Hollywood
star. The baby is a boy. When Charlotte remarked that she wanted to have a
big, showy party for the Bris,Darren remarked that it would have to be a
small, private service at home because of the media. No problem, they just
won't have the big catered affair she wanted to make.
I'm fairly certain if you asked ten people who Rachel Weicz was, about
2 would know. I've seen most of her films and I really like her very
much, but I don't want to know anything about her personal life. When
you see them, if you do, will you just say; "Hi Darrachael?"
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT: I have a question for you.
- From: Lucille
- Re: OT: I have a question for you.
- References:
- Re: OT: I have a question for you.
- From: bhill705
- Re: OT: I have a question for you.
- From: Jangchub
- Re: OT: I have a question for you.
- From: Lucille
- Re: OT: I have a question for you.
- From: Betty Vereen Hill
- Re: OT: I have a question for you.
- From: Jangchub
- Re: OT: I have a question for you.
- From: Betty Vereen Hill
- Re: OT: I have a question for you.
- From: Pat P
- Re: OT: I have a question for you.
- From: Sharon
- Re: OT: I have a question for you.
- From: Jangchub
- Re: OT: I have a question for you.
- From: Lucille
- Re: OT: I have a question for you.
- Prev by Date: Re: OT: I have a question for you.
- Next by Date: Re: STILL OT - back to the name thing Re: OT: I have a question for you.
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: I have a question for you.
- Next by thread: Re: OT: I have a question for you.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|