Re: OT: I have a question for you.
- From: Jangchub <sakadawa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 13:52:00 GMT
On 30 May 2006 18:53:51 -0700, "Sharon" <clancyc@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Silly, yes Pat ... but it was just a silly little fun discussion till
someone made it nasty with her holier than thou attitude. THAT is what
is silly - not the throwing around of what the name really means, etc.
Sharon (N.B.)
All I said was that I hoped they would get all the privacy they can
muster and wished people would stop calling Brangelina. How was that
holier than thou?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT: I have a question for you.
- From: Lucille
- Re: OT: I have a question for you.
- References:
- OT: I have a question for you.
- From: Lucille
- Re: OT: I have a question for you.
- From: Jangchub
- Re: OT: I have a question for you.
- From: bhill705
- Re: OT: I have a question for you.
- From: Jangchub
- Re: OT: I have a question for you.
- From: Lucille
- Re: OT: I have a question for you.
- From: Betty Vereen Hill
- Re: OT: I have a question for you.
- From: Jangchub
- Re: OT: I have a question for you.
- From: Betty Vereen Hill
- Re: OT: I have a question for you.
- From: Pat P
- Re: OT: I have a question for you.
- From: Sharon
- OT: I have a question for you.
- Prev by Date: Re: OT: I have a question for you.
- Next by Date: Re: OT: I have a question for you.
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: I have a question for you.
- Next by thread: Re: OT: I have a question for you.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|