Re: OT: I have a question for you.

Sorry, no, I don't wear or own a clown nose or shoes and have never required
them, but I'll bet if that should change, I wouldn't need to look any
further than your home, which must be bursting at the seams with them. You
surely have to buy them by the gross to keep your act fresh and provocative.
You are such a kidder.

"Jangchub" <sakadawa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:brnp72htlbu2q1vuo9grbu519n4omhtagi@xxxxxxxxxx
Hahahaha. I like being entertained. Do you also wear a clown nose
and big clown shoes?

On Wed, 31 May 2006 20:02:57 -0400, <bhill705@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Your comprehension is lacking. I suggested the word "killfile" as a means
for you to permanently delete my posts. I have no need to killfile your
posts, as I am game for anything you dare to throw my way in the form of
invective, and I find your posts amusing, to say the least. It beggars
the
imagination that you find a connection between your pompous claim of
completely intentional acts and the free-flowing communication in the
newsgroup. I have no fear of committing a grammatical mistake, as I am
human and know that I have made errors in grammar in the past and will
undoubtedly make them in the future. What I will never endure is the
arrogance of one who warns me to never make such a mistake. If your body
of
posts in this newsgroup is indicative of your nature, you are a bitter,
spiteful woman who relishes the chance to lash out at anyone who strikes
your fancy, and I have no doubt that you are in your own perverted state
of
ecstasy as you spew and foment discord. The more you can insult and
incite,
the more joy you can derive. Now, I hope you are feeling all better.

"Jangchub" <sakadawa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ougp725vdqn72rl2idink8lbir0o1mt74g@xxxxxxxxxx
Yes, everything I do is intentional. In case you haven't noticed,
people have no problems opening their mouths with either a debate,
fight or pissing match on this newsgroup. Far as I can tell, there
are no sissy's here, sister.

I never threatened you, I pointed out that when you make a point at
letting someone know their grammar is poor, you really never ought to
make a mistake. So, what you see out here is a reflection of
yourself.

Now go figure that out. Oh, forgot, I'm in the filter.

On Wed, 31 May 2006 17:42:07 -0400, <bhill705@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Oh, riiiiiiiight, everything you do is intentional; you intentionally
try
to
construct your posts in such a way that the members of the newsgroup
cannot
comprehend your message. Makes perfect sense to me, LOL. You are the
self-appointed goddess of the newsgroup who can issue orders to those
whose
posts you would prefer not to read, to intimidate them into never
posting
again. You are a real piece of work, and my pity for you only
increases.
I
will post as often as I choose, and your scare tactics are completely
wasted
on me. Here's the word of the day for you: KILLFILE.


"Jangchub" <sakadawa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:nkbp72psquv4q2vgev4k344hdthn19nc5j@xxxxxxxxxx
Everything I do is intentional.

Best you never post another thing since eventually something you say
will be grammatically incorrect.


On Tue, 30 May 2006 14:10:51 -0400, "Betty Vereen Hill"
<CSWAINSBORO@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

This post is convincing evidence to me that the poster has lost any
grasp
she may have ever had on proper sentence construction. If one tries
to
comprehend the message, it is completely nonsensical. Double uh-huh
back
at
ya'.

"Jangchub" <sakadawa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:5p1p72tg1i0u8cieu1jgp3mc80m3ioq3il@xxxxxxxxxx
I guess the person who I was responding to you didn't do or say
anything in order for such a reply by me. Uh huh.

On Tue, 30 May 2006 12:40:40 -0400, "Betty Vereen Hill"
<CSWAINSBORO@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Personal, vitriolic attacks are clearly a component of the lifeblood
of
the
poster, and when an unknown person is attacked for expressing views
which
are impersonal, the neurotic compulsion to seek out a "victim" on
whom
to
unload her bile and venom, of which there is clearly an
overabundance,
becomes a laughable event. She is to be pitied.

"Lucille" <lucillez1nospamallowed@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:LNqdnWeWOtjm7eHZRVn-uA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
It seems to me that a question about a name has, as usual, become
a
personal attack on someone. In this case, you don't even know who
it
is
you're attacking.

As you are so fond of saying, "get a life" and stop being nasty.

If someone wants privacy they can move to a quiet place and get a
job
that
isn't of any interest to anyone except their immediate family.

Lucille

"Jangchub" <sakadawa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:fiqo721t5gj2d9o05dpe2nqffht7853nca@xxxxxxxxxx
Not knowing who you are, I would have to say you need to HAVE a
heart
to have a bleeding heart. You are a cold fish, apparently.

On Tue, 30 May 2006 16:33:02 -0400, <bhill705@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

Let's all join hands and give thanks to the bleeding hearts who
are
worried
about the privacy of Brad and Angelina and about the fact that
their
names
have been intertwined by the press. Hold on, I'll have to break
ranks
with
you while I grab a barf bag.


"Jangchub" <sakadawa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:7fql72th3dffgbbkv8km0r01s8o52p6sd0@xxxxxxxxxx
On Sun, 28 May 2006 19:39:29 -0400, "Lucille"
<lucillez1nospamallowed@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I'm curious to get other's thoughts on this VERY unimportant
matter
and
I
guess this is mainly for residents of the U.S., but anyone is
free
to
answer.

It has come across as a newsflash that Brangelina, Angelie
Jolie
and
Brad
Pitt, have named their new baby girl Shiloh Belle.

My question: What's the first thing that comes to mind when
you
hear
the
word Shiloh?

Lucille


I wish them all the privacy they can muster and that people
stop
referring to them as Brangelina.














.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: ATR FAQ (part 2: outside Britain)
    ... This monthly posting contains a list of Frequently Asked Questions ... the FAQ contains European characters which may ... Basic newsgroup "netiquette". ... Are there archives where I can find older posts on a subject? ...
    (alt.talk.royalty)
  • Re: Dear Paul, July 12, 2006, updated, July 13, 2006, updated
    ... Evidently when you scanned the newsgroup to pick up a few impressive ... Tom C. ... Now, will you go away, and take the other brainless, off-topic posters ... For grins, I did just what you said, Harry; searched for posts by ...
    (rec.pyrotechnics)
  • Re: SwingWorker.execute() does nothing
    ... So you are violating the newsgroup charter by posting to it. ... All such posts, after all, are automatically off-topic and a waste of bandwidth. ... Ditto not respecting a followup-to header that was used for its intended purpose, to redirect a thread out of a newsgroup when its topic has drifted away from that group's purpose and it's become mostly noise to that group. ...
    (comp.lang.java.programmer)
  • Re: Frequent event 529 in Securit
    ... Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 ... this machine was running 2000 Server. ... |> This newsgroup only focuses on SBS technical issues. ... When responding to posts via your ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • RE: RWW Menu - No companyweb option
    ... companyweb option on the screen prints, trust me this time - the Sharepoint ... > Microsoft CSS Online Newsgroup Support ... > This newsgroup only focuses on SBS technical issues. ... When responding to posts via your newsreader, ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)