Re: OT: I have a question for you.
- From: "Sharon" <clancyc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 May 2006 18:53:51 -0700
Pat P wrote:
"Betty Vereen Hill" <CSWAINSBORO@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:sU%eg.38844$qd2.10018@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
This post is convincing evidence to me that the poster has lost any grasp
she may have ever had on proper sentence construction. If one tries to
comprehend the message, it is completely nonsensical. Double uh-huh back
at ya'.
"Jangchub" <sakadawa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:5p1p72tg1i0u8cieu1jgp3mc80m3ioq3il@xxxxxxxxxx
I guess the person who I was responding to you didn't do or say
anything in order for such a reply by me. Uh huh.
On Tue, 30 May 2006 12:40:40 -0400, "Betty Vereen Hill"
<CSWAINSBORO@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Personal, vitriolic attacks are clearly a component of the lifeblood of
the
poster, and when an unknown person is attacked for expressing views which
are impersonal, the neurotic compulsion to seek out a "victim" on whom to
unload her bile and venom, of which there is clearly an overabundance,
becomes a laughable event. She is to be pitied.
"Lucille" <lucillez1nospamallowed@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:LNqdnWeWOtjm7eHZRVn-uA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
It seems to me that a question about a name has, as usual, become a
personal attack on someone. In this case, you don't even know who it
is
you're attacking.
As you are so fond of saying, "get a life" and stop being nasty.
If someone wants privacy they can move to a quiet place and get a job
that
isn't of any interest to anyone except their immediate family.
Lucille
"Jangchub" <sakadawa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:fiqo721t5gj2d9o05dpe2nqffht7853nca@xxxxxxxxxx
Not knowing who you are, I would have to say you need to HAVE a heart
to have a bleeding heart. You are a cold fish, apparently.
On Tue, 30 May 2006 16:33:02 -0400, <bhill705@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Let's all join hands and give thanks to the bleeding hearts who are
worried
about the privacy of Brad and Angelina and about the fact that their
names
have been intertwined by the press. Hold on, I'll have to break ranks
with
you while I grab a barf bag.
"Jangchub" <sakadawa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:7fql72th3dffgbbkv8km0r01s8o52p6sd0@xxxxxxxxxx
On Sun, 28 May 2006 19:39:29 -0400, "Lucille"
<lucillez1nospamallowed@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I'm curious to get other's thoughts on this VERY unimportant matter
and
I
guess this is mainly for residents of the U.S., but anyone is free
to
answer.
It has come across as a newsflash that Brangelina, Angelie Jolie and
Brad
Pitt, have named their new baby girl Shiloh Belle.
My question: What's the first thing that comes to mind when you
hear
the
word Shiloh?
Lucille
I wish them all the privacy they can muster and that people stop
referring to them as Brangelina.
Of all the things we get worked up about on here, this must be about the
silliest and most pointless! LOL!
Pat P
Silly, yes Pat ... but it was just a silly little fun discussion till
someone made it nasty with her holier than thou attitude. THAT is what
is silly - not the throwing around of what the name really means, etc.
Sharon (N.B.)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT: I have a question for you.
- From: Jangchub
- Re: OT: I have a question for you.
- References:
- OT: I have a question for you.
- From: Lucille
- Re: OT: I have a question for you.
- From: Jangchub
- Re: OT: I have a question for you.
- From: bhill705
- Re: OT: I have a question for you.
- From: Jangchub
- Re: OT: I have a question for you.
- From: Lucille
- Re: OT: I have a question for you.
- From: Betty Vereen Hill
- Re: OT: I have a question for you.
- From: Jangchub
- Re: OT: I have a question for you.
- From: Betty Vereen Hill
- Re: OT: I have a question for you.
- From: Pat P
- OT: I have a question for you.
- Prev by Date: Re: Another story about the durability of needlework.
- Next by Date: Re: OT: I have a question for you.
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: I have a question for you.
- Next by thread: Re: OT: I have a question for you.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
