Re: OT: I have a question for you.

Yes, everything I do is intentional. In case you haven't noticed,
people have no problems opening their mouths with either a debate,
fight or pissing match on this newsgroup. Far as I can tell, there
are no sissy's here, sister.

I never threatened you, I pointed out that when you make a point at
letting someone know their grammar is poor, you really never ought to
make a mistake. So, what you see out here is a reflection of
yourself.

Now go figure that out. Oh, forgot, I'm in the filter.

On Wed, 31 May 2006 17:42:07 -0400, <bhill705@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Oh, riiiiiiiight, everything you do is intentional; you intentionally try to
construct your posts in such a way that the members of the newsgroup cannot
comprehend your message. Makes perfect sense to me, LOL. You are the
self-appointed goddess of the newsgroup who can issue orders to those whose
posts you would prefer not to read, to intimidate them into never posting
again. You are a real piece of work, and my pity for you only increases. I
will post as often as I choose, and your scare tactics are completely wasted
on me. Here's the word of the day for you: KILLFILE.


"Jangchub" <sakadawa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:nkbp72psquv4q2vgev4k344hdthn19nc5j@xxxxxxxxxx
Everything I do is intentional.

Best you never post another thing since eventually something you say
will be grammatically incorrect.


On Tue, 30 May 2006 14:10:51 -0400, "Betty Vereen Hill"
<CSWAINSBORO@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

This post is convincing evidence to me that the poster has lost any grasp
she may have ever had on proper sentence construction. If one tries to
comprehend the message, it is completely nonsensical. Double uh-huh back
at
ya'.

"Jangchub" <sakadawa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:5p1p72tg1i0u8cieu1jgp3mc80m3ioq3il@xxxxxxxxxx
I guess the person who I was responding to you didn't do or say
anything in order for such a reply by me. Uh huh.

On Tue, 30 May 2006 12:40:40 -0400, "Betty Vereen Hill"
<CSWAINSBORO@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Personal, vitriolic attacks are clearly a component of the lifeblood of
the
poster, and when an unknown person is attacked for expressing views
which
are impersonal, the neurotic compulsion to seek out a "victim" on whom
to
unload her bile and venom, of which there is clearly an overabundance,
becomes a laughable event. She is to be pitied.

"Lucille" <lucillez1nospamallowed@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:LNqdnWeWOtjm7eHZRVn-uA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
It seems to me that a question about a name has, as usual, become a
personal attack on someone. In this case, you don't even know who it
is
you're attacking.

As you are so fond of saying, "get a life" and stop being nasty.

If someone wants privacy they can move to a quiet place and get a job
that
isn't of any interest to anyone except their immediate family.

Lucille

"Jangchub" <sakadawa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:fiqo721t5gj2d9o05dpe2nqffht7853nca@xxxxxxxxxx
Not knowing who you are, I would have to say you need to HAVE a heart
to have a bleeding heart. You are a cold fish, apparently.

On Tue, 30 May 2006 16:33:02 -0400, <bhill705@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Let's all join hands and give thanks to the bleeding hearts who are
worried
about the privacy of Brad and Angelina and about the fact that their
names
have been intertwined by the press. Hold on, I'll have to break
ranks
with
you while I grab a barf bag.


"Jangchub" <sakadawa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:7fql72th3dffgbbkv8km0r01s8o52p6sd0@xxxxxxxxxx
On Sun, 28 May 2006 19:39:29 -0400, "Lucille"
<lucillez1nospamallowed@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I'm curious to get other's thoughts on this VERY unimportant matter
and
I
guess this is mainly for residents of the U.S., but anyone is free
to
answer.

It has come across as a newsflash that Brangelina, Angelie Jolie
and
Brad
Pitt, have named their new baby girl Shiloh Belle.

My question: What's the first thing that comes to mind when you
hear
the
word Shiloh?

Lucille


I wish them all the privacy they can muster and that people stop
referring to them as Brangelina.










.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Thoughts on the movies as a whole
    ... > There are more posts with pack mentality of putting ... > down the members for different ideologies and questions. ... Especially on a newsgroup comprised mostly of adults. ... started out with an attack (the whole, "don't say anything bad about the ...
    (alt.fan.harry-potter)
  • Re: Thanks for all the replies folks, a few more questions...
    ... The bigget issue in this newsgroup has always been about that same freedom. ... I mostly ignore Jiminex because his idea of an argument is to curse like a gutter snipe and gloat over my ... If Jiminex were having a heart attack in front of me I'd perform CPR. ... infuriates Jiminex is that I disagree with some of the things he posts. ...
    (alt.security.alarms)
  • Re: OT: I have a question for you.
    ... for you to permanently delete my posts. ... human and know that I have made errors in grammar in the past and will ... posts in this newsgroup is indicative of your nature, you are a bitter, ... If someone wants privacy they can move to a quiet place and get a ...
    (rec.crafts.textiles.needlework)
  • Re: Detecting operatives for special interests in the NG
    ... it does seem that this newsgroup is filled with industry ... shills and spokespeople for various interests. ... "typo" errors in very long posts. ... things like, "overall, it is fairly good," but then the shills attack ...
    (sci.med.nutrition)
  • Re: OT: I have a question for you.
    ... construct your posts in such a way that the members of the newsgroup cannot ... comprehend the message, it is completely nonsensical. ... If someone wants privacy they can move to a quiet place and get a job ...
    (rec.crafts.textiles.needlework)