Re: NJ Police state: update on pocket popper

On Jul 27, 10:36 pm, "Ed Huntress" <huntre...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:




...you see some patterns, but they have only an uneven correspondence to
levels of gun control or gun ownership. I've seen correlation coefficients
that indicate a high rate of gun crime to rates of gun ownership and/or lax
gun control, and I don't doubt the statistic. But I don't think it tells us
very much in itself. Population density and a variety of demographics show
strong CCs as well, but they aren't uniform, either.


I also doubt that the correlation between high rates of violent crime
and gun ownership mean anything. Looking at the internet site you
posted, Louisiana has a high rate of violent crime, but it used to be
a state that did not issue permits to carry concealed. You could
carry a gun, but not concealed. And if you look at the requirements
to get a CCW in Louisiana, you will see it is not just a request and
get a license. Not with a 120 day processing time.


Of all the people I knew who owned guns, and that was almost every adult and
most of the kids in western MD and northeast PA, I only remember two who
actually shot handguns. We just weren't interested. They had nothing to do
with our central interest, which was hunting, or our secondary interest,
which was target shooting. Shooting targets meant shooting skeet or making
holes in paper bullseyes at 100 - 500 yards. Handguns were useless crap,
unless you liked to collect rattlesnake skins while trout fishing, as one of
my fishing buddies in PA did. He had a .22 revolver. The few handguns that
were around were mostly WWII trophies, in the hands of the adults who served
there. And they stayed in the gun case almost all of their lives.


Not quite the same when I was growing up. There was an interest in
handguns, and there were people that competed in target shooting of
handguns.. But shotguns and .22 rifles were pretty much what people
had. I did not know anyone with a centerfire rifle. There was no use
for them as there was very few deer or other large game. And I did
not know of a range where one could shoot a centerfire rifle.


We get into a discussion about guns here on this NG, and watch what
happens; it's all quick-draw and stopping power (in a human being, rather
than a deer or bear) before the first spit hits the ground.


I do not remember any RCM discussions on quick-draw and stopping power
of handguns. Might be because I just am not that interested in the
topic. But it certainly is not a topic that comes up a lot.



It's one thing to calibrate a possible threat, as Don did in starting this
track of discussion, and make a judgment that the inconvenience of carrying
is worth the extremely remote possibility that you might be glad that you
did, in a situation in which there are some mitigating circumstances that
make it worth more than ordinary consideration. It's another thing
altogether to build a culture around the minutiae of carrying concealed guns
in society and to obsess about the remotest of statistical likelihoods, and
to cook up fantastic scenarios that read like something from a cheap novel
but which have almost no referents in the real world.

The other side also cooks up a lot of fantastic scenarios too. A bad
guy on each side of a car for instance. A bad guy that finds you on
the ground after a heart attack and searches your body. The real
world is that you are not likely to ever need a concealed weapon. And
if you do, the bad guy probably has not done a lot of target
practice.


When you boil it down to essentials, Ranger has the numbers. You won't be
able to build much of a logical argument against it. But you have every
right to self-defense, IMO, and to the means to defend yourself. In other
words, carry if you must, but if you make a big deal out of it, you're
probably in need of emotional help. One hopes that you don't lose your cool
at the wrong time. Or that the fantasies carry you away and you wind up
giving everyone the creeps. And the way much of our gun culture has morphed
into some kind of a soldier-of-fortune fantasy, it can be very creepy
indeed.

I do not remember Rangerssucks ever using any numbers or actual facts
in this discussion.
His arguments seemed to be pretty much that one should not carry a
concealed weapon because you may be better off without a gun.

Dan

--
Ed Huntress

.

Relevant Pages

  • It is now closer to reality than you think.
    ... Police arrive and inform you that the second burglar ... 1920 expanded licensing to include not only handguns but all firearms except ... private citizens and mandated the registration of all shotguns. ... For many years, the media had portrayed all gun owners as mentally unstable, ...
    (rec.hunting)
  • Re: HandGuns
    ... There isn't a gun, handgun or otherwise that opperates itself. ... injury-in homicides, suicides, and unintentional shootings-is carried ... consumer health and safety lead to one inevitable conclusion: handguns ... only 25 percent of adults own a firearm. ...
    (alt.politics)
  • Re: Oops CBS news poll not going how they thought.
    ... majority of people want tougher gun control. ... Public Attitudes towards the Regulation of Firearms ... 80% favor criminal background checks for all sales of guns, ... a total ban on individuals owning handguns. ...
    (talk.politics.guns)
  • Re: Oops CBS news poll not going how they thought.
    ... Public Attitudes towards the Regulation of Firearms ... 80% favor criminal background checks for all sales of guns, ... for stricter gun control, and 54% want illegal gun sales to ... a total ban on individuals owning handguns. ...
    (talk.politics.guns)
  • Re: Would John and George have been OK if they had guns?
    ... Unless the law has changed in the past two years, on my last trip to the ... I recall a farmer being sent to prison for shooting burglars. ... Handguns are totally banned in the UK since that school shooting in ... We talked and he fixed the gun. ...
    (rec.music.beatles)
Loading