Re: OT: 69% are worse off
- From: "Hawke" <desmithers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 15:15:01 -0700
"Wes" <clutch@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:dMGhk.235037$pm2.63713@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"John R. Carroll" <jcarroll@ubu,machiningsolution.com> wrote:twenty
We'll be lucky to have fully recovered from what's happening now even
different.years from now and when we do our place in the world will be very
be abandoned as
With a little luck, we will be 100% powered by nuclear, the windmills will
being too expensive, your electric car will have a decent battery and ahydro or hydro
carbon powered apu for range. We will still have oil.his lifetime. If
I think T. Boon went for wind because he figured he could get it done in
he could have got nuclear plants up quick I bet he would have investeddifferently. Part
of the art of politics is recognizing the doable and working inside thatframework. In
the world of the future, a nuclear facility will be located on that windfarm, after all,
the power lines are there.now the cheapest
Electric heat will be the norm, since due to nuclear power plants, it is
least polluting form of energy on the planet.countries with
Our national debt will have been erased since we and Canada are the only
hydrocarbons to sell to the now depleted world market at prices that make$140 a barrel
oil seem cheap.the rest of us
Some bitter clingers will cling to their photocells and home windmills but
will get to enjoy what the "environmentalist's" denied us for decades.CHEAP CLEAN
ENERGY.
Wes
The price of a kilowatt of power generated by wind is four cents. Nothing
else is close to that, wind never runs out, and it produces no nuclear
waste. That's why Pickens is for it. Nuclear power has more negatives to it
than wind and it's more expensive.
Hawke
.
- References:
- OT: 69% are worse off
- From: Hawke
- Re: OT: 69% are worse off
- From: Don Foreman
- Re: OT: 69% are worse off
- From: RAM³
- Re: OT: 69% are worse off
- From: Gunner Asch
- Re: OT: 69% are worse off
- From: dav1936531
- Re: OT: 69% are worse off
- From: Wes
- Re: OT: 69% are worse off
- From: Hawke
- Re: OT: 69% are worse off
- From: RB
- Re: OT: 69% are worse off
- From: Eregon
- Re: OT: 69% are worse off
- From: John R. Carroll
- Re: OT: 69% are worse off
- From: Wes
- OT: 69% are worse off
- Prev by Date: Re: OT: 69% are worse off
- Next by Date: Re: OT-Taxpayer Surprise #2
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: 69% are worse off
- Next by thread: Re: OT: 69% are worse off
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|