Re: OT - The Affluent, Too, Couldn't Resist Adjustable Rates

On Sun, 23 Mar 2008 15:34:53 -0400, "Ed Huntress"
<huntres23@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:



If a person buys a house with a mortgage they can afford, they can
still afford it even if the house value declines to negative equity
for a while -- unless they then leverage equity increase with
increasing market value to maintain absolutely all the debt they can
afford to keep up with and perhaps a bit more. This can only work in
a monotonically increasing market, and no market does that forever.

Not so. A downturn doesn't change your mortgage payments. If you can make
the payments, you can ride out a downturn even if you have no money down on
the house.

I thought that's what I said. If it isn't, it is what I meant to say.
They only get in trouble if they borrow against increased equity, get
extended to the max and then have a glitch in cash flow.


But there's no necessity for them to do so. The only advantage in having
more money down is that you're more likely to come out of it without paying
money out of your pocket, or without going broke, if you have, say, 20% down
on the house. But that means you've lost most of your 20%, too. So as a
borrower, you want the least money down consistent with your ability to pay
and the terms you can get. If you have the 20%, put it in the bank and take
the low-down-payment loan.

That's what I did -- twice.

Lately the lenders have been offering *very* nice terms -- as long as you
get out of it before the balloon in rates.


Speculating in real estate is no different than speculating in any
other market. Speculating with an asset that is one's shelter is
"smart" only if it works, really dumb if it doesn't.

True enough. But it has pretty consistently worked until very recently.

More so long-term than short-term, though.

"The inflation-adjusted average price of an existing home peaked in
1979, didn't bottom out until 1984 and didn't return to the 1979 level
until 1995."

Source: Barron's Insight by Gene Epstein, WSJ "Sunday", 3/23/08.
(Today).

One who really knows the market can do well by buying and selling the
right properties in the right neighborhoods in the right region(s) at
the right times. Some do indeed make a lot of money at it.


I figured it was some kind of phoric. d8-)
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Today is a great day in and for America Ot
    ... did what Democrats so often do, they ignored whose money they were spending. ... The crisis that started when people bought more house than they ... buy another house that they could afford even less? ... increasing real estate values always saved the financial ...
    (rec.scuba)
  • Re: OT: AARP
    ... We saved money, invested, and bought a small house we could afford on one income. ... We spend a great deal of money on medical expenses that aren't covered by health insurance, and the health of neither of us is improving. ... If we had bought a house that took two incomes to keep, we would have had to sell it. ... I don't even think cookie cutter lives exist. ...
    (sci.med.transcription)
  • Re: WTF? A new tax?
    ... afford a house, they are not what you would generally think of as ... renting at the market rent. ... investors are helping to renovate housing stock. ...
    (uk.legal)
  • Re: WTF? A new tax?
    ... afford a house, they are not what you would generally think of as ... property market away and bring house prices back to a sensible level. ... investors are helping to renovate housing stock. ...
    (uk.legal)
  • Re: OT: AARP
    ... 50% of their income because that is all they can afford. ... This was the cheapest house they could find and needed lots ... then the money tree in the backyard would still flower. ... The younger generation is not drivign the price of houses up. ...
    (sci.med.transcription)
Loading