Re: Boring a hole question...
- From: Larry Jaques <novalidaddress@di\/ersify.com>
- Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2008 05:54:24 -0800
On Sat, 01 Mar 2008 10:07:11 GMT, with neither quill nor qualm,
"Harold and Susan Vordos" <vordos@xxxxxxx> quickly quoth:
"Mechanical Magic" <google@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:36911538-f679-455e-803e-ec99c9acd5af@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
snip----
Where I disagree: measuring a smallish hole with calipers. To suggest
that +-.005" is to be expected, is leading the inexperienced down the
wrong path. I have tried all my calipers with a .2000" ring, and they
ALL read a smaller diameter, by different amounts. I don't believe a
hole measurement to within .010"
Dave
Grin!
I was trying to avoid an ugly confrontation with those the seem to think
that a caliper, particularly a digital, is the ultimate in precision. I've
had conversations with such individuals, and they rarely will be denied
their opinion. What fools they are. I have used a decent scale
(Starrett C305R) with as much precision as I've achieved with calipers.
I use them only when it clearly does not matter. They're great for checking
the size of raw stock.
Aw, 'Arry, you're just being fussy. Measure with a micrometer, cut
with a hacksaw, grind to size, hammer to fit.
--
An idealist believes the short run doesn't count. A cynic believes
the long run doesn't matter. A realist believes that what is done
or left undone in the short run determines the long run.
-- Sydney J. Harris
.
- References:
- Re: Boring a hole question...
- From: Harold and Susan Vordos
- Re: Boring a hole question...
- Prev by Date: Re: Boring a hole question...
- Next by Date: Re: Neighbours envy, owners pride
- Previous by thread: Re: Boring a hole question...
- Next by thread: Re: Boring a hole question...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading