Re: Unions
- From: "Tom Gardner" <tom(nospam)@ohiobrush.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 13:17:25 -0500
"Ed Huntress" <huntres23@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:e4kYi.28$dP.8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Tom Gardner" <tom(nospam)@ohiobrush.com> wrote in message
news:skiYi.63601$Um6.43819@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<snip>
I can remember when we had 80 employees, now I have 16 and our sales are
more than double and profits are quadruple. AUTOMATION!!! And, we will
be putting a new machine on line this month that eliminates an entire job
but boosts the pay of everybody in that wook cell.
Careful, Tom. The next piece of automation that you put in may eliminate
*you*. Be sure to read the fine print. d8-)
--
Ed Huntress
I'm old enough now that I plan just that! Not a machine but procedures and
protocols properly followed and I shouldn't need to be here full time. One
of my buds owns a fishing charter and could use a first mate. Another bud
plays golf 7 times a week and could use a partner. One of my cousins has
over 1,000 DVDs, and I have relatives all over the world that need unwelcome
house guests. Get the picture?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Unions
- From: Michael A. Terrell
- Re: Unions
- From: Ed Huntress
- Re: Unions
- References:
- Unions
- From: Millwright Ron
- Re: Unions
- From: Tom Gardner
- Re: Unions
- From: azotic
- Re: Unions
- From: Tom Gardner
- Re: Unions
- From: Ed Huntress
- Unions
- Prev by Date: Re: OT - Democrats and Waterboarding -- The party will lose the presidential race if it defines itself as soft on terror
- Next by Date: Re: Seeking help from the Group...Again. Afghanistan Bridge Project
- Previous by thread: Re: Unions
- Next by thread: Re: Unions
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
