Re: WTC Towers: the case for controlled demolition
- From: Lew Hartswick <lhartswick@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 17:32:22 -0600
Louis Ohland wrote:
I looked at the reference, and it makes NO claim for a controlled explosion. The only events were the plane impacts and the collapses.
Would these nutjobs calculate the number of demolition charges required to bring down the towers AND calculate the building prep to place those charges? It's not like the night janitor went up with a stick of TNT in his lunchbox...
schoenfeld.one@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
WTC Towers: The case for controlled demolition
By Herman Schoenfeld
In this article we show that "top-down" controlled demolition
REFERENCES
"Seismic Waves Generated By Aircraft Impacts and Building Collapses at
World Trade Center ", http://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/LCSN/Eq/20010911_WTC/WTC_LDEO_KIM.pdf
Why in the world does anyone even respond to this crap??????
...lew...
.
- References:
- Re: WTC Towers: the case for controlled demolition
- From: Louis Ohland
- Re: WTC Towers: the case for controlled demolition
- Prev by Date: Re: Siemens SED2 VFD / Quincy 10 HP compressor troubles
- Next by Date: Re: machine wedge in UHMW
- Previous by thread: Re: WTC Towers: the case for controlled demolition
- Next by thread: Polishing stainless steel
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|