Re: OT- Portable Nuclear Power Plants

On Tue, 09 Oct 2007 22:38:15 GMT, "Vaughn Simon"
<vaughnsimonHATESSPAM@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


"Brian Lawson" <lawsonb@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ro9ng3hmoa4blq3keeljjtpp6g0mr3593p@xxxxxxxxxx
, the need for rapid and multitudinous
changes of power required over the course of any 24 hour period
(sometimes as high as 1500 change-orders per shift) and which nuclear
plants at present are not able to modulate. This last item is what
I'm writing about.

That is not true. Nuclear reactors can modulate their output perfectly
well. In fact, a pressurized water reactor (that is the most common type of
reactor) changes power nearly automatically to match demand because of its
negative temperature coefficient .

(Vaughn gets a far away look in his eyes) Back in my nuclear reactor
operator days, I could watch power vary from (say) 10% to well over 50% and not
touch a single control. Larger power changes just took a little bump of the
control rod position.

Commercial nuclear reactors are operated near their full power capacity for
economic reasons, not because they are not capable of being modulated.

Vaughn


Hey Vaughn,

Hmmmmm....so, I wonder...why we still have coal-fired plants, and why
the latest plants built are coal-fired too? Just cost? Just time (to
build)? Just disposal problems? Just politics? Or do you see an
actual purpose for the coal-fired units, at least at present?

And just a question about your statement...

...."I could watch power vary from (say) 10% to well over 50%"

Are you saying a variation of 10% to 50% of full power, or 10 to 50%
of say 80% baseline, was automatically controlled through NTC? Or
would the cooling towers see a fair load shed? And would this power
generation be at the suggested 1500 possible changes per shift? What
am I, and apparently all the people that are debating this here in
Ontario, missing?

Interesting stuff!!

Brian Lawson,
Bothwell, Ontario.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: This months popular science - hydrogen powered hyper jet
    ... fuel and petro-based ag-chems vs. ethanol yield. ... However the nuclear plant has an economic lifespan of less than 40 years. ... Nuclear power plants are not vulnerable to ... Nuclear power plants in a "war" situation are very attractive targets. ...
    (sci.energy.hydrogen)
  • Re: Apprenticeship for our Future
    ... 100 NPPs (nuke power plants) here in the USA. ... a major portion of the costs. ... their chops" but large-scale implementation of nuclear power ...
    (rec.crafts.metalworking)
  • Re: About renewable energy
    ... mature nuclear power technology than the US and commissioning plants ... anti-nuclear power, period, but siting/building plants is not QED. ... Actually, TMI I, almost 5 years older than TMI 2 is still in operation, ...
    (misc.rural)
  • Re: Nuclear Power - the only answer.
    ... > cheaper power, cleaner air, water and land, more abun- ... government because decisions my government makes can affect my health ... If I am offered the choice of nuclear power plants dotting my country ...
    (soc.culture.scottish)
  • Westinghouse to begin work on 4 nuclear plants for CHINA
    ... KW/hr of power used in an average US home. ... The two Areva plants will output, together, 3200 MWs --David] ... Westinghouse to begin work on 4 nuclear plants ... Monroeville-based Westinghouse and its consortium partner, ...
    (sci.energy)
Loading