Re: A novel gasoline substitute
- From: Jim Stewart <jstewart@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 14:23:44 -0700
Jon Elson wrote:
Richard J Kinch wrote:
azotic writes:Some friends of mine did this about 40 years ago. They blew out windows
http://www.motherearthnews.com/library/1980_March_April/I_Run_My_Car_on
_Acetylene
Hydrocarbons are a near ideal fuel. The energy density and "hazard density" are extremely low. Calcium carbide, like ethanol, carries a lot of dead weight. Hydrocarbon fuel-air mixes are explosive, but not anything like acetylene. Heard those tales of garbage bags inflated from a welding torch?
for blocks!
Consider boron metal instead of carbide. Zero emissions: you capture the exhaust and regenerate it at home with electricity. The fuel is dense and not too hazardous to store, so unlike gasoline, you could stockpile large quantities at home to improve distribution efficiency. The big problem is a practical engine.Actually, if you don't run fuel cells, then a Stirling engine makes a good way
to convert heat to mechanical power. It isn't very responsive in terms of
rapid acceleration, so a hybrid would be the way to go.
Based on what I've seen, it's hard to imagine
a Stirling that could fit into an automobile
and produce meaningful amounts of power.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A novel gasoline substitute
- From: Trevor Jones
- Re: A novel gasoline substitute
- References:
- A novel gasoline substitute
- From: azotic
- Re: A novel gasoline substitute
- From: Richard J Kinch
- Re: A novel gasoline substitute
- From: Jon Elson
- A novel gasoline substitute
- Prev by Date: Re: way OT: concrete stamps
- Next by Date: Re: New Low
- Previous by thread: Re: A novel gasoline substitute
- Next by thread: Re: A novel gasoline substitute
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|