Re: Brown's gas??
- From: "J. Clarke" <jclarke.usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 01:29:07 -0500
Leo Lichtman wrote:
>
> "Tim Wescott" wrote: (clip) That may be the one (partially) true claim,
> actually.
>>
>> Hydrogen remains largely transparent as it burns, so it emits very
>> little light. (clip)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Tim, only if you DEFINE temperature in terms of radiant emission can you
> cling to that statement. Are you aware of the deaths that have occurred
> at
> the Indy Speedway because alcohol flames are not visible in daylight? If
> a torch truly produced a low temperature flame, it wouldn't be worth s**t
> for
> welding. It isn't necessary to heat some other surface in order to have
> heat. One of the laws of thermodynamics is that heat ALWAYS flows from a
> higher temperature to a lower temperature. If the flame were really cool,
> it COULD NOT HEAT ANYTHING TO A HIGHER TEMPERATURE.
And this is at variance with a claim about radiated heat how?
--
--John
to email, dial "usenet" and validate
(was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)
.
- References:
- Brown's gas??
- From: T.Alan Kraus
- Re: Brown's gas??
- From: Andy Dingley
- Re: Brown's gas??
- From: Tim Wescott
- Re: Brown's gas??
- From: Leo Lichtman
- Brown's gas??
- Prev by Date: Re: OT--Taking on city hall
- Next by Date: Re: Brown's gas??
- Previous by thread: Re: Brown's gas??
- Next by thread: Re: Brown's gas??
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading