Re: Weights & Measures + Temperature
- From: "Steven T King" <kingst919@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2005 16:56:12 -0500
while that is the standard now, it was originally chosen because it was the
estimate for one ten-millionth of the distance from the Equator to the
North Pole. Not exactly arbitrary, but chopped down to a convenient size.
stk
"steveb" <me@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:afmdk1tmuo85dbngp7aqi3pbeab2ua0r67@xxxxxxxxxx
> On 7 Oct 2005 09:39:48 -0700, alebrewer@xxxxxx wrote:
>
>>What's the meter based on? If you dig far enough, you'll find that
>>it's based on an arbitrary assumption on the circumference of the Earth
>>(itself, an arbitrary planet).
>
> No, it isn't
>
> It's based upon the wavelength of sodium light in a vacuum
>
> steveb
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Weights & Measures + Temperature
- From: steveb
- Re: Weights & Measures + Temperature
- References:
- Weights & Measures + Temperature
- From: Dick Adams
- Re: Weights & Measures + Temperature
- From: alebrewer
- Re: Weights & Measures + Temperature
- From: Scott Lindner
- Re: Weights & Measures + Temperature
- From: alebrewer
- Re: Weights & Measures + Temperature
- From: steveb
- Weights & Measures + Temperature
- Prev by Date: Re: Weights & Measures + Temperature
- Next by Date: Re: Weights & Measures + Temperature
- Previous by thread: Re: Weights & Measures + Temperature
- Next by thread: Re: Weights & Measures + Temperature
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|