Re: about addresses and spam block
- From: "Christina Peterson" <tinapetrsn@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 19:22:30 -0800
OK. Now the ISP is the middle part, right? Like yours is bellsouth? As I
mentioned to Georgia, it's hard to imagine the major carrier in Alaska
getting marked as spam. And at the same time, Alaska's small population
should show up that heavily on the spam radar either.
I had just sent a message to Sarajane from her website. And that may have
more protection just because of the public nature of websites. And no, I'm
quite sure I wasn't rejected by her, nor did I give up. I just switched to
my Yahoo address. The one commonly known to the public (newsgroups, etc).
I'm just curious about the general subject.
Tina
"Comcast" <e_lewis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:GdGdnWXTa7L4FXjfRVn-oQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> This had nothng to do with your email address. It had to do with your ISP
> getting on a list of suspected spam domains.
>
> Spamcop is one of several services with compiles lists of suspect IP
> addresses that a postmaster can use to filter out suspected spam. To
quote
> from the spamcop website, spamcop "is aggressive and often errs on the
side
> of blocking mail."
>
> For some reason, your ISP's IP address, 209.112.173.225, was on spamcop's
> blacklist when your email got rejected. It's no longer on their black
list,
> which implies that it was a false positive, your ISP complained, and
spamcop
> took it off the blacklist..
>
> I would never reject email based on spamcop alone.
>
> Elise
> (who spends half her work life fine-tuning spam filters)
>
>
> "Christina Peterson" <tinapetrsn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:42e55cd9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > My mail gets rejected. Today an e-mail to Sarajane was returned by
> spamcop
> > "(reason: 553 Blocked - see
> > http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?209.112.173.225)"
> >
> > I am guessing this new address was rejected because the "pc", especially
> as
> > the first 2 letters, sounds like advertising for software. (My other
> > address went through). And I'm wondering if it's common to block for
> that.
> >
> > For different reasons, my daughter-in-laws mail often gets blocked. Her
> > email is her patronymic, Haborivna (literally the daughter of
> Habor/Gavor).
> > Sometimes more than spam gets blocked.
> >
> > Tina
> >
> >
> > "Barbara Forbes-Lyons" <penguintrax@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > news:42e545d7$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Tina,
> > >
> > > Is your outgoing mail bouncing back to you or are you having problems
> > > recieving mail? Can you tell us (me) what errors you are getting? That
> > > would help us fix the problem.
> > >
> > > ----------
> > > Barbara
> > > www.penguintrax.com
> > >
> > > eBay & Justbeads:penguintrax
> > >
> > > <0
> > > /O\
> > > <><>
> > >
> > > Nurturing doesn't end at birth: breastfeed, co-sleep, babywear.
> > >
> > > There is a very fine line between a hobby and mental illness.
> > > (Dave Barry)
> > >
> > > Need quality, inexpensive web hosting? Check out
> http://www.lyonshost.com.
> > Shopping carts, blogs, image galleries, content management and more!
> >
> >
>
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: about addresses and spam block
- From: EL
- Re: about addresses and spam block
- From: Georgia
- Re: about addresses and spam block
- References:
- about addresses and spam block
- From: Christina Peterson
- Re: about addresses and spam block
- From: Barbara Forbes-Lyons
- Re: about addresses and spam block
- From: Christina Peterson
- Re: about addresses and spam block
- From: Comcast
- about addresses and spam block
- Prev by Date: Re: OMG!! Look at this gorgeous witch!
- Next by Date: Re: Some good news!
- Previous by thread: Re: about addresses and spam block
- Next by thread: Re: about addresses and spam block
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|